>>> The definition of DW_OP_piece differs, though: "[...] the placement of
>>> the piece within that register is defined by the ABI."
>>
>> Right.
>
> Right, and...? Is it intentional that DW_OP_piece(n)" is not
> necessarily equivalent to "DW_OP_bit_piece(8*n, 0)?
There is no intent.
>> For ins
On Tue, Jan 24 2017, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> On 12 December 2016 at 09:28, Andreas Arnez wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 09 2016, Adrian Prantl wrote:
>>
>>> Here's my take on this.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
On Dec 9, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Andreas Arnez
wrote:
[...]
* What is the correct placement ru
