Hi Ron,
Thanks for the reply, in-line below...
Ron Brender wrote:
1. I am not enough of an C++ lawyer to comment on the meaning of
lexical blocks inside "std". But I don't recall that the formal
definition of "std" has any such blocks--if not, the presence here is
either wrong
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the reply. In-line below...
Michael Eager wrote:
> On 09/15/14 10:32, John DelSignore wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> TotalView has a customer that has C++ code that produces the
>> following DWARF with the Intel 12.1
>> compiler:
>
> ICC generates a lot of idiosyncratic DWARF.
I would
1. I am not enough of an C++ lawyer to comment on the meaning of lexical
blocks inside "std". But I don't recall that the formal definition of "std"
has any such blocks--if not, the presence here is either wrong or the
sloppy remains of some block nested in something else that did not get
properly
On 09/15/14 10:32, John DelSignore wrote:
Hi,
TotalView has a customer that has C++ code that produces the following DWARF
with the Intel 12.1
compiler:
ICC generates a lot of idiosyncratic DWARF.
<0><1192a2>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit)
DW_AT_comp_dir: ...SNIPPED...
Hi,
TotalView has a customer that has C++ code that produces the following
DWARF with the Intel 12.1 compiler:
<0><1192a2>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit)
DW_AT_comp_dir : ...SNIPPED...
DW_AT_language : 4 (C++)
DW_AT_name : ...SNIPPED...
DW_AT_prod
