Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Default Location List Entry Issue 130121.1

2014-04-07 Thread Michael Eager
On 04/07/14 05:28, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 08:26 -0700, Michael Eager wrote: On 04/03/14 01:51, Mark Wielaard wrote: You are correct that I am confused about this definition. Not because of the either/or but about how to express the choices in DWARF. I don't understand how fo

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Default Location List Entry Issue 130121.1

2014-04-07 Thread Michael Eager
On 04/07/14 03:04, Mark Wielaard wrote: OK. It would be good to mention that explicitly (and how to make clear how to distinguish local variables from global ones, but that is the subject of the other thread in this discussion). Since the range can be read as if it was valid outside the range of

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Default Location List Entry Issue 130121.1

2014-04-07 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 08:26 -0700, Michael Eager wrote: > On 04/03/14 01:51, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > You are correct that I am confused about this definition. Not because of > > the either/or but about how to express the choices in DWARF. I don't > > understand how for a DWARF Data Object DIE I ex

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Default Location List Entry Issue 130121.1

2014-04-07 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 13:46 +, Robinson, Paul wrote: > > > A default location list entry (as proposed in 130121.1) gives the > > location > > > of an object for address values which are not otherwise specified in > > the > > > location list. > > > > Maybe an example of this would be helpful to