Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Default Location List Entry Issue 130121.1

2014-04-01 Thread Michael Eager
On 04/01/14 13:54, Mark Wielaard wrote: What about using the presence of a DW_AT_external attribute on the data object that has a single location expression to know whether the described location is valid/visible outside of the enclosing lexical scope? Using that or some new flag (DW_AT_global_

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Interaction between aranges and unit proposals

2014-04-01 Thread Eric Christopher
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > I have been pondering the various aranges proposals and how they > interact with the change to merge the units proposal. It looks like the > intent of two proposals is diminished by two other proposals. > > To make it possible to quick

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Default Location List Entry Issue 130121.1

2014-04-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:14:51PM -0700, Michael Eager wrote: > On 03/31/14 10:59, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > >My interpretation comes from 2.6 Location Descriptions, item 1. Single > >location descriptions which says "They are sufficient for describing the > >location of any object as long as its

[Dwarf-Discuss] Interaction between aranges and unit proposals

2014-04-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, I have been pondering the various aranges proposals and how they interact with the change to merge the units proposal. It looks like the intent of two proposals is diminished by two other proposals. To make it possible to quickly see whether an address (range) is covered by an ELF file contai