Hi,
I was reading the DWARF5 proposal Issue 130121.1 Default Location List
Entry http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=130121.1 and was wondering
how to interpret the phrase "(provided that address is within the
containing module)" from the introduction.
In the actual text of the proposal there
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 15:18 -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > The proposed DWARF5 suggestion "dynamic properties of types: reference
> > interpretation" http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=100805.1 says:
> > [...]
> We did discuss this at the September meeting, but the issue page
> didn't get upda
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 09:16 -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
> On 09/25/13 03:38, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Asking because I was wondering if it would make sense to propose
> > DW_LANG_C11 (ISO/IEC 9899:2011) for DWARF5?
>
> Yes, if there are differences in meaning for DWARF attributes which
> depend on
