On 06/24/2013 07:42 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
I was looking for the DW_OP_implicit_pointer issue write up since it is
the best description of the current DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer as
currently output by GCC. But the location changed. It used to be
available at: http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIs
Hi,
I was looking for the DW_OP_implicit_pointer issue write up since it is
the best description of the current DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer as
currently output by GCC. But the location changed. It used to be
available at: http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=100831.1
Apparently the new locat
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:43:15PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Pardon me if I sound dense (not really my area of expertise), wowever, the 2nd
> word in FDE above (@.Lframe0) is a direct reference to start of .debbug_frame
> shouldn't it be something like
>
> @.Lframe0 - @.Lframe0
>
> i.e. zero.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:06:27PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> I had a question about interpretation of FDE's CIE_pointer field (for
> .debug_frame)
>
> The spec say (from dwarf4 version although it really doesn't matter):
>
> "2. CIE_pointer (4 or 8 bytes, see Section 7.4)
> A constant offset
