Hi!
Is it OK to have different permissions for the different functions in a
DRM IOCTL, requiring the caller to be root on some functions but not
other?
/Thomas
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews
Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi!
Is it OK to have different permissions for the different functions in a
DRM IOCTL, requiring the caller to be root on some functions but not
other?
You mean by adding additional checks within the body of an ioctl
somewhere, on top of the simple flags where the ioctl is
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Is it OK to have different permissions for the different functions in a
>> DRM IOCTL, requiring the caller to be root on some functions but not
>> other?
>
> You mean by adding additional checks within the body of an ioctl
> somewhere, on top of the simple fla
Am Mo, den 20.12.2004 schrieb Keith Whitwell um 16:54:
[snip]
> Hi Felix,
>
> Your patch looks good to me. If you're looking for ways to avoid the
> indirect function call, probably the way to do it is to somehow try and
> get onto the DO_FALLBACK path. This is difficult for PTEX vertices as
Felix Kühling wrote:
Am Mo, den 20.12.2004 schrieb Keith Whitwell um 16:54:
[snip]
Hi Felix,
Your patch looks good to me. If you're looking for ways to avoid the
indirect function call, probably the way to do it is to somehow try and
get onto the DO_FALLBACK path. This is difficult for PTEX ver
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2119
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
r300_demo status:
* I double checked and r300_demo works fine on my computer
(Mobility M10) with DRM from DRI CVS
(radeon_drv version 1.13.0)
* I have added a test mode for drawing using vertex buffers.
It draws some triangles, without lockups but in
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2118
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-21 09:24 ---
OK, previous m
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
r300_demo status:
* I double checked and r300_demo works fine on my computer
(Mobility M10) with DRM from DRI CVS
(radeon_drv version 1.13.0)
* I have added a test mode for drawing using vertex buffers.
It dra
We have scheduled a three day X Developer's meeting from
Saturday, February 12, through Monday, February 14, 2005, at the
Cambridge Research Laboratory (CRL) in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
This is the weekend before Linux World Expo in Boston, so we hope
the time will reduce travel wear and tear on
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1794
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-21 12:46 ---
I'm seeing rin
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-21 15:06 ---
This problem c
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-21 15:08 ---
Created an att
This patch converts MODULE_PARM to module_param, fixing a "deprecated"
warning with 2.6.10-rc*.
Signed-Off-By: Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: dri/drm/linux/drm_drv.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/dri/drm/linux/drm_drv.h,v
retrieving revi
I fixed one of the warnings but am not sure what to do about these.
Kernel is 2.6.10-rc2.
make -C /home/rlrevell/kernel-source/linux-2.6.9 SUBDIRS=`pwd` DRMSRCDIR=`pwd`
modules
make[2]: Entering directory `/smb/rlrevell/kernel-source/linux-2.6.9'
CC [M] /home/rlrevell/cvs/dri/drm/linux-2.6/vi
This breaks the multiple drivers in kernel is memory serves correctly...
this is all fixed in the core/personality split going into 2.6.11
hopefully..
Dave.
> #ifdef MODULE
> static char *drm_opts = NULL;
> #endif
> -MODULE_PARM( drm_opts, "s" );
> +module_param(drm_opts, charp, 0);
>
> /**
they should all be fixed in the linux-core stuff inter_module will be
when we Linus takes my changes for 2.6.11
Dave.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> I fixed one of the warnings but am not sure what to do about these.
> Kernel is 2.6.10-rc2.
>
> make -C /home/rlrevell/kernel-sourc
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 02:44 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> they should all be fixed in the linux-core stuff inter_module will be
> when we Linus takes my changes for 2.6.11
>
OK, thanks for clarifying.
Lee
---
SF email is sponsored by -
18 matches
Mail list logo
