>>
> Dave,
> I thought we agreed at the XDS to remove the libdrm list helpers, and
> let the drivers themselves take care of this?
> However before that's done, i915 needs a Superioctl, so we don't break
> that driver.
>
Just confirming that's what we suggested :-), I have a i915 superioctl I
nee
Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I'm just looking at the list handling code in the TTM for libdrm,
> and I really don't think we can just leave it as-is but making it
> generic also doesn't look that easy (it would at least require adding
> destructor paths for free list object contents)
>
> Thomas, any id
I'm just looking at the list handling code in the TTM for libdrm,
and I really don't think we can just leave it as-is but making it generic
also doesn't look that easy (it would at least require adding destructor
paths for free list object contents)
Thomas, any ideas on how best to handle it?
