Sorry, mouse went wonky for a second there.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Johannes Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What did you want to say, Alex? I only got the quotes. ;)
>
> Greetings, Johannes
>
-
This SF.net email
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:48:55 -0800
> Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:36 am Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > Dave there is one things that is needed to be redone: frame buffer
> >
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/08, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:33 am Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > the current API abstracts connectors from outputs, so in reality it
> > > is encoders with c
On 2/28/08, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:33 am Dave Airlie wrote:
> > the current API abstracts connectors from outputs, so in reality it
> > is encoders with connector properties at the moment.
> >
> > you define a connector type and a connector i
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:48:55 -0800
Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:36 am Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > Dave there is one things that is needed to be redone: frame buffer
> > creation & handling. And i would like we not freeze the API until
> > we had some time
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:12:07 +0100
"Jakob Bornecrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm guessing a flag system could be used, sorta like the BO flags.
> There are some things to consider: should we allow driver dependant flags on
> it
> or should those be exposed in a driver specific ioctl.
On 2/28/08, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please don't let any api freezing depend on fedora core, at least give
> > external parties time to play with it once it's reasonably stable,
> > this will undoubtely reveal limitations. It should be in mainline drm
> > well before api f
On Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:33 am Dave Airlie wrote:
> the current API abstracts connectors from outputs, so in reality it
> is encoders with connector properties at the moment.
>
> you define a connector type and a connector id for each output and
> can gang them together..
>
> so wrt to the
On Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:36 am Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Dave there is one things that is needed to be redone: frame buffer
> creation & handling. And i would like we not freeze the API until
> we had some time to play with it a bit. So i guess my question is
> does this means modesetting API
> Please don't let any api freezing depend on fedora core, at least give
> external parties time to play with it once it's reasonably stable,
> this will undoubtely reveal limitations. It should be in mainline drm
> well before api freezing it.
>
It's not called Fedora core any more :), but I
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
> > what I'm up to with it..
> >
> > So I really want to ship somethin
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:53:46 +1000
>
> "Dave Airlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
> > what I'm up to with it..
> >
> > So I really want
On 2/28/08, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
> what I'm up to with it..
>
> So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting
> in it, whether this is a default or a special boot option for the use
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
> what I'm up to with it..
>
> So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting
> in it, whether this is a default or a special bo
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:53:46 +1000
"Dave Airlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
> what I'm up to with it..
>
> So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting
> in it, whether this is a default or a special
On 2/28/08, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
> what I'm up to with it..
>
> So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting
> in it, whether this is a default or a special boot option for the use
So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
what I'm up to with it..
So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting
in it, whether this is a default or a special boot option for the user
I won't decide for a while.
But with this in mind I've check
17 matches
Mail list logo
