https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #15 from Rafae
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #14 from Maxim Levitsky 2010-06-18
00:25:30 ---
+1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #13 from Maxim Levitsky 2010-04-03
13:42:55 ---
This bug is fixed long time ago.
could somebody with permissions mark it as CLOSED?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
Gordon Jin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Gordon Jin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #11 from Maxim Levitsky 2009-09-10
01:47:04 ---
I think this is fixed.
I don't see any leaks now
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Maxim Levitsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[email protected]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich 2009-06-08 19:47:18
---
All problems disappear when I enable i915 KMS.
Xorg VSIZE reduces from 500M to 200M, VT switch does not cause any warnings.
So, bug only appears in non-KMS mode.
--
Configure bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|12398 |
Regression|Yes
me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
> > Subject : i915: drm: xorg leaks drm objects massively
> > Submitter : Sergei Trofimovich
> > Date: 2009-05-10 19:56 (29 days old)
> >
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich 2009-05-27 18:17:26
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > [ 648.278242] [drm:i915_get_vblank_counter] *ERROR* trying to get vblank
> > count
> for disabled pipe 1
>
> This message is gone in 2.6.30-rc7. Th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich 2009-05-27 18:15:28
---
> [ 648.278242] [drm:i915_get_vblank_counter] *ERROR* trying to get vblank
> count
for disabled pipe 1
This message is gone in 2.6.30-rc7. The rest does not look as kernel bug.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich 2009-05-22 19:11:01
---
Looks like it's my case: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20766
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich 2009-05-17 14:00:42
---
No, i just didn't notice this problem before.
Maybe I did not hold weekly uptimes or 2.6.29 didn't leak so fast.
2.6.29 is actually first kernel i managed to start Xorg on this ha
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|13070 |12398
--- Comment #2 from Rafael J
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[email protected]
--- Comment #1 f
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Summary: i915: drm: xorg leaks drm objects massively
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30-rc4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status
I sent these patches last week, but as I had the wrong subject line on them
(DRM instead of DRM/i915), I'm afraid they may have gone unnoticed. Here's
a resend just to make sure that they're seen by the right people.
Regards,
Jonas Bonn
South Pole Consulting AB
www.southpoleconsulting.com
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18180
Gordon Jin changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dri-|[email protected]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
--- Comment #5 from [email protected] 2009-02-03 01:31 ---
Ok, MSI helps me. I think it's worth to force MSI in code whenever user enables
i915 drm...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] 2009-01-06 02:33 ---
Eric, do you mean Message Signaled Interrupts? Sorry MSI has too many
meanings... If yes, then you are right I had it disabled and if it is required,
probably kernel configuration
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
--- Comment #3 from [email protected] 2009-01-05 13:45 ---
Something is broken in your configuration that is preventing MSI. You need MSI
for stable graphics on this chipset.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
--- Comment #2 from [email protected] 2009-01-05 13:06 ---
Looks like bios update did not fixed this problem. Again I've got irq16 diabled
error, but this time error message is different:
[drm:i915_gem_idle] *ERROR* hardware wedged
irq 1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
--- Comment #1 from [email protected] 2009-01-05 02:55 ---
Answering question Niku asked me:
> Could you try booting with pci=noacpi ?
I'm unable to boot this notebook PC with pci=noacpi as I get kernel panic:
VFS: Cannot open root devi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12161
[email protected] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[email protected]
--- Comment #3 fr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
[email protected] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
Summary: [i915 drm] irq 16: nobody cared with 2.6.28 kernel
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
[email protected] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
[email protected] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #16 from [email protected] 2009-01-03 01:59 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> The current XAA userland bits are regularly broken and we're not putting any
> effort into fixing them since it's a dead end path. If EXA works, I'd
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #15 from [email protected] 2009-01-02 14:20 ---
The current XAA userland bits are regularly broken and we're not putting any
effort into fixing them since it's a dead end path. If EXA works, I'd call
this WONTFIX.
Dylan's (l
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
[email protected] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[email protected]
--- Comm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #13 from [email protected] 2008-12-15 00:17 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Ok, so what do you see if you use EXA (and out of curiosity what's the other
> bug you're avoiding by using XAA)?
>
Sorry for late response. If I u
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #12 from [email protected] 2008-12-13 10:19 ---
Adam, any news?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14044
Pierre Willenbrock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12161
[email protected] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
[email protected] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 09:13 ---
Ok, so what do you see if you use EXA (and out of curiosity what's the other
bug you're avoiding by using XAA)?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12161
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.4.28-rc3 |2.6.28-rc3
--
Configure bugmail: h
On dim, 2008-12-07 at 23:16 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12161
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
> Ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12161
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.28-rc6-00142-g9bd062d |2.4.28-rc3
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12161
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 12:12 ---
Reference : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18609
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12161
Summary: [i915 drm] irq 16: nobody cared with latest git kernels
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28-rc6-00142-g9bd062d
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-03 03:31 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Please try current Linus' tree, it contains several important DRM fixes.
>
Still broken in 2.6.28-rc7-git1, I don't see any improvement.
--
Conf
This bug was first reported a few weeks ago and it seems still hasn't
been resolved for some. The bug report can be found here,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18609 .
- Ben
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:21 +0100, fredi ml wrote:
> Hi all,
> lately starting from kernel 2.6.28-rc6-00142-g
[Resending as the first one was rejected for being html. Forgot about
gmail defaults]
Hi all,
lately starting from kernel 2.6.28-rc6-00142-g9bd062d I'm getting this traces:
Dec 1 12:09:34 kotys irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the
"irqpoll" option)
Dec 1 12:09:34 kotys Pid: 3617, comm: X
Hi all,
lately starting from kernel 2.6.28-rc6-00142-g9bd062d I'm getting this
traces:
Dec 1 12:09:34 kotys irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll"
option)
Dec 1 12:09:34 kotys Pid: 3617, comm: X Not tainted
2.6.28-rc6-00142-g9bd062d #17
Dec 1 12:09:34 kotys Call Trace:
Dec 1 12:0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-30 15:19 ---
Please try current Linus' tree, it contains several important DRM fixes.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 04:18 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Adam, does your corruption look like Dylan's? To me that looks like a render
> acceleration bug. Try adding Option "ExaNoComposite" "true" to your x
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 11:01 ---
Adam, does your corruption look like Dylan's? To me that looks like a render
acceleration bug. Try adding Option "ExaNoComposite" "true" to your xorg.conf
intel driver section
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 04:22 ---
Problem still exists in 2.6.28-rc6-git1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 13:37 ---
Notify-Also : Dylan Taft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 19:26 ---
I have an i915 mobo, specs and backtraces and other info found in the bugs I
posted on freedesktop
If I have more than 4 gigs of ram, X may display corrupted graphics and w
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-16 09:52 ---
Notify-Also : Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 01:56 ---
Screenshots are on http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/i915-corruption/ (created via
xwd, open it via "xwud < screenshot")
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpref
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
Summary: i915 DRM is broken in 2.6.28-rc4
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28-rc4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18180
Summary: i915 drm module: suspend to ram works only if invoked
after resuming from suspend to disk
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14044
--- Comment #1 from Pierre Willenbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-12 13:01:45
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=13677)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13677)
Patch mitigating my problems
--
Configure bugmail: http://bu
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14044
Summary: Kernel Oops in i915 drm module
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Hi,
When I try the kernel modules from current drm-git instead of the
stock ones, I get the following crash as soon as compiz launches any
effect with mipmap enabled.
I managed to get a backtrace of the crash, but I got screen corruption
and a full kernel freeze immediately after I quit the debugg
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:12 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Friday, October 26, 2007 10:10 am Kay Sievers wrote:
> > The conversion is already queued in Greg's tree, and in -mm:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/patches.git;a=blob;f
> >=driver/drm-convert-from-class_device-to-dev
On Friday, October 26, 2007 10:10 am Kay Sievers wrote:
> The conversion is already queued in Greg's tree, and in -mm:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/patches.git;a=blob;f
>=driver/drm-convert-from-class_device-to-device-in-drivers-char-drm.pa
>tch;h=f993183d1cb017f981cc2232d1793
On 10/26/07, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:59 pm Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:53:18PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Ok, here's yet another version that uses the device model for the
> > > suspend/resume, rather than pci hooks.
> > >
>
On Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:59 pm Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:53:18PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Ok, here's yet another version that uses the device model for the
> > suspend/resume, rather than pci hooks.
> >
> > Greg, DRM desperately needs review of its device model usage,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:53:18PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ok, here's yet another version that uses the device model for the
> suspend/resume, rather than pci hooks.
>
> Greg, DRM desperately needs review of its device model usage, can you
> take a look at this patch and the current drm_sysfs
Ok, here's yet another version that uses the device model for the
suspend/resume, rather than pci hooks.
Greg, DRM desperately needs review of its device model usage, can you
take a look at this patch and the current drm_sysfs.c code? Right now,
we're mixing class_devices and regular devices (the
On Wednesday, 24 October 2007 17:18, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:35:14 am Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > We seem to see a lot of bug reports along the lines of, "my machine
> > > resumes but I can't see X" or, "I can see X but only with a bright
> > > flashlight",
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:15:43PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Friday, October 19, 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Dave can you take a look at the new flag and also see what you think
> > about supporting suspend/resume in the event X hasn't started yet?
> > There's some #if 0'd code to support t
On Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:17 pm Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > diff --git a/linux-core/Kconfig b/linux-core/Kconfig
> > index 2d02c76..5e73fc7 100644
> > --- a/linux-core/Kconfig
> > +++ b/linux-core/Kconfig
> > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ config DRM_I810
> >
> > choice
> > prompt "Intel 830M, 845G, 852G
On Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:35:14 am Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > We seem to see a lot of bug reports along the lines of, "my machine
> > resumes but I can't see X" or, "I can see X but only with a bright
> > flashlight", etc. These sorts of problems are due to the fact that
> > the X serv
Hi!
> We seem to see a lot of bug reports along the lines of, "my machine
> resumes but I can't see X" or, "I can see X but only with a bright
> flashlight", etc. These sorts of problems are due to the fact that
> the X server isn't designed to do full state save/restore, and none
> of the availa
On Friday, October 19, 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Dave can you take a look at the new flag and also see what you think
> about supporting suspend/resume in the event X hasn't started yet?
> There's some #if 0'd code to support that case, but I haven't tested
> it.
Ok Dave, this one's been updated
On Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:01 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> We seem to see a lot of bug reports along the lines of, "my machine
> resumes but I can't see X" or, "I can see X but only with a bright
> flashlight", etc. These sorts of problems are due to the fact that
> the X server isn't designed to
We seem to see a lot of bug reports along the lines of, "my machine
resumes but I can't see X" or, "I can see X but only with a bright
flashlight", etc. These sorts of problems are due to the fact that
the X server isn't designed to do full state save/restore, and none
of the available kernel driv
Summary|x86_64: Kernel oops in GIT |Kernel oops in GIT version
|version of i915/drm |of i915/drm
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-09 09:24 ---
NOTE
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9289
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-09 09:21 ---
Creat
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9289
Summary: x86_64: Kernel oops in GIT version of i915/drm
Product
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7473
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7473
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-11 12:48 ---
First
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7473
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-10 00:27 ---
Do th
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7473
Summary: intel 945gm graphic adapter not detected by i915 drm
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5098
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-16 14:09 ---
Wow,
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-14 12:01 ---
i915 DRM has been committed to
it out yourself. That
probably means looking at the probe/attach stuff in the core drm, figuring out
why i915 DRM isn't attaching to the special drmsub device that the intel AGP
driver is creating just for the drm to attach to.
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5098
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-20 06:32 ---
As fa
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity|major |enhancement
Summary|Missing drm/dri support for |i915 DRM needs to be ported
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:11:40PM -0400, Christopher Allen Wing wrote:
> I am testing a x86_64 computer with integrated i945G video. The existing
> i915 DRI driver seems to work correctly on it once you tell it the correct
> PCI IDs.
>
> Is anyone looking into supporting the newer Intel chips? Ju
> I am testing a x86_64 computer with integrated i945G video. The existing
> i915 DRI driver seems to work correctly on it once you tell it the correct
> PCI IDs.
>
> Is anyone looking into supporting the newer Intel chips? Just treating it
> like a i915G seems to work for me. Here is a patch agai
I am testing a x86_64 computer with integrated i945G video. The existing
i915 DRI driver seems to work correctly on it once you tell it the correct
PCI IDs.
Is anyone looking into supporting the newer Intel chips? Just treating it
like a i915G seems to work for me. Here is a patch against DRM CVS
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:01:19AM +, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> you checked in some changes to the i915 drm but the changelog looks like
> you did more did you miss some changes in the checkin?
>
> mainly it says added resume functionality but the
Hi Alan,
you checked in some changes to the i915 drm but the changelog looks like
you did more did you miss some changes in the checkin?
mainly it says added resume functionality but the patch just changed a
function name added the pci id and bumped the driver version...
Dave.
--
David
> I was poking through the code for i915 DRM, trying to find the source of the
> resume failure. It looks like the i915_resume function can't be called by
> anything -- am I wrong about this? If I'm right, how should it be enabled?
I think Keith will have to answer this
Hey,
I was poking through the code for i915 DRM, trying to find the source of
the resume failure. It looks like the i915_resume function can't be
called by anything -- am I wrong about this? If I'm right, how should it
be enabled?
Regardless, I have some doubts about the allocation
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:15:29PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> >
> > Have you ported the required i915 AGP changes as well ??
>
> well I've only got a i865 so I hopefully don't need any i915 specific
> stuff..
O.k. that makes sense. It wasn't clear from your original email.
Maybe Eric can she
>
> Have you ported the required i915 AGP changes as well ??
well I've only got a i865 so I hopefully don't need any i915 specific
stuff..
Dave.
--
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie
pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
-
Dave Airlie wrote:
I've just checked in the basics of the i915 DRM for FreeBSD but nothing
happens... I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1,
After I kldload i915.ko I see nothing in the dmesg... am I missing
something? or as the AGP driver stolen the card?
Oh, yes. This is something you need
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:18:05PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I've just checked in the basics of the i915 DRM for FreeBSD but nothing
> happens... I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1,
>
> After I kldload i915.ko I see nothing in the dmesg... am I missing
> something? or
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
