On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Abraham Varricatt
wrote:
...
> Thank you for your reply Jerome.
>
> I was hoping that I could join in the development of the API or
> something, but if it's more than a year old ...
>
> The test applications in libdrm bug me. I can understand that
> development was
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 14:55 +0530, Abru wrote:
> > The way GEM is designed, the memory manger is split up into 2 sections.
> > One section residing in the kernel and the other in userspace (or
> > libdrm). According to what I've read (maili
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 14:55 +0530, Abru wrote:
> The way GEM is designed, the memory manger is split up into 2 sections.
> One section residing in the kernel and the other in userspace (or
> libdrm). According to what I've read (mailing list archives), the
> userspace section is supposed to be d
The way GEM is designed, the memory manger is split up into 2 sections.
One section residing in the kernel and the other in userspace (or
libdrm). According to what I've read (mailing list archives), the
userspace section is supposed to be device specific. Or at least, should
be different depen
