2009/8/13 Thomas Hellström :
> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> 2009/8/11 Thomas Hellström :
>>
>>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs
> represent
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:48:33PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:24:58 -0700
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:59:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:21:24 +0200
> > > Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:59:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:21:24 +0200
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:29:39 +0200
> > > Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, 11 A
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:48:33PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:24:58 -0700
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:59:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:21:24 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Thomas Hellström :
>
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
>>> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hi!
I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs
representation for connectors instead
2009/8/11 Thomas Hellström :
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
>> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs
>>> representation for connectors instead of a struct kobject?
>>>
>>> In particular, what stops the d
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:24:58 -0700
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:59:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:21:24 +0200
> > Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> > > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:29:39 +0200
> > > > Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:21:24 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:29:39 +0200
> > Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
> >>> Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:29:39 +0200
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
>>> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hi!
I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs
repre
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:29:39 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
> > Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs
> >> representation for connectors instead of a struct kobje
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs
>> representation for connectors instead of a struct kobject?
>>
>> In particular, what stops the drm_sysfs_[suspend|resume] functions to
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:09 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs
> representation for connectors instead of a struct kobject?
>
> In particular, what stops the drm_sysfs_[suspend|resume] functions to
> get called for the connectors,
Hi!
I'm wondering why we are using a struct device as a sysfs representation
for connectors instead of a struct kobject?
In particular, what stops the drm_sysfs_[suspend|resume] functions to
get called for the connectors, having them cast to a struct drm_minor
and sending the cpu to the bushes
13 matches
Mail list logo