On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 16:27, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked
> > if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__
> > has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine
>
Eric Anholt wrote:
One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked
if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__
has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine
for gcc 2.95. Any opposition?
Most of linux-kernel still uses &
One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked
if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__
has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine
for gcc 2.95. Any opposition?
--
Eric Anholt[EMA
