On 5/15/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2005 18:27, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > On 5/15/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 14 May 2005 10:45, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > Our egl extension is supposed to expose the full OpenGL
> > > > implementation, r
On Sunday 15 May 2005 18:27, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 5/15/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 10:45, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > Our egl extension is supposed to expose the full OpenGL
> > > implementation, right? For example egl Context is not exposing the
> > > full O
On 5/15/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 May 2005 10:45, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > Our egl extension is supposed to expose the full OpenGL
> > implementation, right? For example egl Context is not exposing the
> > full OpenGL context. Don't we need some way to turn on full O
On Saturday 14 May 2005 10:45, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Our egl extension is supposed to expose the full OpenGL
> implementation, right? For example egl Context is not exposing the
> full OpenGL context. Don't we need some way to turn on full OpenGL
> support and then add all of the defines needed?
I d
