Re: DRM formatting issues.

2004-11-01 Thread Jon Smirl
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 08:29:28 -0800, Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've made some progress on converting BSD, but when I got to the linux > code added to the shared radeon driver code, I lost motivation. > Hopefully I'll get back to it soon, but it's pretty frustrating to work > on. Wher

Re: DRM formatting issues.

2004-11-01 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 07:58, Jon Smirl wrote: > linux-2.6 formatting is the accumulation of ten years worth of hand > editing. The Linux kernel people have made numerous complaints about > this since it does not follow the Linux kernel formatting standards. > linux-core has be run through a program

Re: DRM formatting issues.

2004-11-01 Thread Jon Smirl
linux-2.6 formatting is the accumulation of ten years worth of hand editing. The Linux kernel people have made numerous complaints about this since it does not follow the Linux kernel formatting standards. linux-core has be run through a program to make it match the Linux kernel standards. What I

Re: DRM formatting issues.

2004-11-01 Thread Jacek Rosik
Dnia 01-11-2004, pon o godzinie 11:32 +0100, Thomas Hellström napisał (a): > > Hi, > > > > Currently files in linux[-2.6] and linux-core directories have different > > formating (and shared* dirs too of course). This is only causing > > unnecessary pain to people trying to change something. Everyth

Re: DRM formatting issues.

2004-11-01 Thread Thomas Hellström
> Hi, > > Currently files in linux[-2.6] and linux-core directories have different > formating (and shared* dirs too of course). This is only causing > unnecessary pain to people trying to change something. Everything has to > be done twice, as even simple patch may not apply against those dirs, >