On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:44:07 + (UTC)
Jeff Muizelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aapo Tahkola rasterburn.org> writes:
>
> >
> > r300 driver now supports this in HW.
> > It should work pretty well as long as GART is big enough and application
> doesn't request to draw with more
> > than 65535
Aapo Tahkola rasterburn.org> writes:
>
> r300 driver now supports this in HW.
> It should work pretty well as long as GART is big enough and application
doesn't request to draw with more
> than 65535 verts.
>
What needs to be done to add support for this on r200?
-Jeff
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 04:11:58 +0100
Roland Scheidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > Using umark for benchmarking UT2004 (1024x768 with all "low" or "very
> > low" display settings)... First DM-1on1-Albatross:
> >
> > 9600 - fgl - 11.378239 / 35.393394 / 82.763985 fps
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
I had some time yesterday and thought I'd do a quick comparision of
the DRI drivers and fglrx drivers for three different cards I have,
and I thought others on this list might be interested in the results.
All tests were conducted on a dual 2.8 xeon, with a gig of RAM. T
