On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 04:56, Eric Anholt wrote:
> - What should the DRM do if the minor number for either DI or DD
> interface is greater than the DRM knows about?
Return DRM_ERR( EINVAL ) ?
> - Do we want to put some reserved fields in the SET_VERSION ioctl in
> case we want to extend it in som
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 13:59, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 04:56, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > - What should the DRM do if the minor number for either DI or DD
> > interface is greater than the DRM knows about?
>
> Return DRM_ERR( EINVAL ) ?
Okay, that's what it's doing.
> > - Do we wa
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/drm-unique-2.diff
Here's my first shot at the changes for unique handling in the DRI. It
includes a new ioctl, DRM_IOCTL_SET_VERSION. This takes in a struct
containing numbers for the major/minor version of the device independent
DRM interface and majo
