thats what I meant :)
--- Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:04:33AM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Speaking of agp, what would be needed to add apg 8x support to the
> > radeon driver? does the value of 'apgmode' just get passed on to
> the
> > agpcode? I'd im
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:04:33AM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Speaking of agp, what would be needed to add apg 8x support to the
> radeon driver? does the value of 'apgmode' just get passed on to the
> agpcode? I'd imagine there might be some bits to flip on the radeon.
I think X might stil
Speaking of agp, what would be needed to add apg 8x support to the
radeon driver? does the value of 'apgmode' just get passed on to the
agpcode? I'd imagine there might be some bits to flip on the radeon.
Alex
--- Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
> Any comments ? The linkage bet
Folks,
Any comments ? The linkage between AGP & DRI is somewhat
icky currently, and Rusty's proposal makes a lot of sense,
especially if the inter_module_* goo is going to go away
(It's already marked as deprecated in 2.5)
Dave
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:25:27PM +1000, Rusty
