On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 09:34:17 +0100
José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix,
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:47:18AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
> >More results:
> >
> >I get the same strange behaviour when I compile with -march=pentium2. I
> >could narrow it down to lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/rad
Felix,
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:47:18AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
More results:
I get the same strange behaviour when I compile with -march=pentium2. I
could narrow it down to lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_state.c. Then
I split radeon_state.c and put only one non-static function at a tim
More results:
I get the same strange behaviour when I compile with -march=pentium2. I
could narrow it down to lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_state.c. Then
I split radeon_state.c and put only one non-static function at a time in
a new radeon_state2.c along with the necessary static functions. On
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:19:02 -0700
From: "Allen H. Ibara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] gcc-3.2 problem and Makefile inconsistency
> I was referring to another problem. I described it in a mail with
> s
Am Samstag, 12. Oktober 2002 20:19 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:59:21 -0700
>
> "Allen H. Ibara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I'm able to reproduce the incorrect dark lighting with
> > 'pulsar -light' as you described it.
>
> I was referring to another probl
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:59:21 -0700
"Allen H. Ibara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I'm able to reproduce the incorrect dark lighting with
> 'pulsar -light' as you described it.
I was referring to another problem. I described it in a mail with
subject "Strange effects with Radeon750
Hi,
I think I'm able to reproduce the incorrect dark lighting with
'pulsar -light' as you described it.
I tried to capture it in screen-shots here:
http://thibs.menloschool.org/~aibara/pulsar-light1.png
http://thibs.menloschool.org/~aibara/pulsar-light2.png
I've built everything from a dri cvs
Hello,
I've looked into my gcc-3.2 problem again and found out that gcc-3.2
with -march=athlon produces the problem I described in every detail in a
previos mail (wirebox example).
What made this so tedious to find (the problem was appearing and
disappearing arbitrarily) is an inconsistency in th
