Keith Whitwell wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Wednesday, Jun 4, 2003, at 17:45 US/Central, José Fonseca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:17:52PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
This is what the Stanford checker turned up recently when analyzing the
copy_to/from_user calls in the Linux kernel:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Wednesday, Jun 4, 2003, at 17:45 US/Central, José Fonseca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:17:52PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
This is what the Stanford checker turned up recently when analyzing the
copy_to/from_user calls in the Linux kernel:
[...]
This is all bec
On Wednesday, Jun 4, 2003, at 17:45 US/Central, José Fonseca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:17:52PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
This is what the Stanford checker turned up recently when analyzing
the
copy_to/from_user calls in the Linux kernel:
[...]
This is all because the DRM_COPY_FROM_US
José Fonseca wrote:
Hollis,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:17:52PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
This is what the Stanford checker turned up recently when analyzing the
copy_to/from_user calls in the Linux kernel:
[...]
This is all because the DRM_COPY_FROM_USER_UNCHECKED is being called in
ra
Hollis,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:17:52PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> This is what the Stanford checker turned up recently when analyzing the
> copy_to/from_user calls in the Linux kernel:
>
[...]
>
> This is all because the DRM_COPY_FROM_USER_UNCHECKED is being called in
> radeon_cp_d
This is what the Stanford checker turned up recently when analyzing the
copy_to/from_user calls in the Linux kernel:
-
[BUG] function radeon_cp_dispatch_indices calls
DRM_COPY_FROM_USER_UNCHECKED on parameter 'dev_priv->sarea_priv->boxes',
