The DRI snapshots can be used with the Xorg packages in Debian
experimental. I've edited the wiki to reflect this. Hope that's OK!
I've got the r200 snapshot working happily[1].
cheers, Phil
[1] PageFlip seems broken however -- rendering errors with Quake4[2] at
least, which go away when P
The DRI snapshots can be used with the Xorg packages in Debian
experimental. I've edited the wiki to reflect this. Hope that's OK!
I've got the r200 snapshot working happily[1].
cheers, Phil
[1] PageFlip seems broken however -- rendering errors with Quake4[2] at
least, which go away when Pag
Hi,
snapshots are broken due to a missing texutil.h:
gcc-3.3 -c -O2 -gstabs+ -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wundef
-pipe -g -I../../../../../../exports/include/X11
-I../../../../../../
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 00:37, José Fonseca wrote:
> Just to let everybody know that all snapshots are failing ATM.
>
> I get the following error on all logs:
>
>
> gcc -m32 -o xf86cfg -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic
> -Wall -Wpointer-
Just to let everybody know that all snapshots are failing ATM.
I get the following error on all logs:
gcc -m32 -o xf86cfg -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:17:23 +0100
José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix,
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
> > disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one
Felix,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
> disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the
> problem was that libexpat was not installed on the system. Could the
> snapsho
Hi,
there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the
problem was that libexpat was not installed on the system. Could the
snapshot build be changed to link the drivers statically with libexpat?
In either case I'l
> I haven't tried the snapshots and I haven't heard from anyone using the
> vanilla snapshots without my patches yet, so I'm not sure if there are any
> problems there.
Well, at least I can confirm that in my mostly 3.1-based system (at
least the kernel and XFree are 3.1-built) your 2.96-based s
I'm using 2.96, so I think I may have to start including all the DRI stuff
in my patched XV binaries to avoid binary compatibility problems. This
can also be caused by changes to the SAREA in the DRI branch, so I think
it might be easier to keep things in sync that way. I got one report from
som
> We also haven't recived feedback regarding non-radeon cards.
I would be happy to give some feedback on mach64 - but I am using Leif's
spanshots now (2.96-built AFAIK) - just because they give me xvideo.
Leif, are you still using 2.96 or moving to 3.x?
Regards,
Sergey
---
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 03:24:56PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>Should we stop producing snapshots temporarily until the
>xaa/compiler/who-knows-what problems are resolved?
>
>There seem to be a lot of complaints about the ones up there now...
>
>Keith
I have no problem stopping the snapshot bu
Should we stop producing snapshots temporarily until the
xaa/compiler/who-knows-what problems are resolved?
There seem to be a lot of complaints about the ones up there now...
Keith
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to
On Fre, 2002-09-27 at 04:25, Andy Dustman wrote:
>
> Most obvious feature of this is what looks like a NULL pointer
> reference at the end. Also there is a load/unload/load of the xaa
> module.
That's expeceted, the only way to find out the version of the xaa module
is to try loading the new ver
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 04:25, Andy Dustman wrote:
> Still getting the same problem with the r200. Interestingly, the amount
> of memory used for textures has gone up recently, from about 93 MB to
> 113 MB. Most obvious feature of this is what looks like a NULL pointer
> reference at the end. Also t
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 20:50, Andy Dustman wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:40, Charl P. Botha wrote:
>
> > serious note, have you tried replacing your libxaa.a yet to eliminate
> > the possibility of that signal 11 that we've been seeing with the last
> > few snapshots? You could also try a sna
Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 03:20 schrieb Andy Dustman:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 19:22, José Fonseca wrote:
> > AFAIK the announced breakeage concerned C++ only.
>
> Well, there is some c++ code in libnurbs, and so apparently libGLU.so.
> However it appears that wouldn't affect the DRI snapshots
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 19:22, José Fonseca wrote:
> AFAIK the announced breakeage concerned C++ only.
Well, there is some c++ code in libnurbs, and so apparently libGLU.so.
However it appears that wouldn't affect the DRI snapshots.
> RedHat does indeed provides a compat-gcc package. I'll see wh
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:40, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> serious note, have you tried replacing your libxaa.a yet to eliminate
> the possibility of that signal 11 that we've been seeing with the last
> few snapshots? You could also try a snapshot of today or later, because
> Michel has fixed the XAA
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote:
>
>> I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has
>> gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version.
>> AFAIK this shouldn't pose any pro
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:32, Andy Dustman wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has
> > gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version.
>
> If the kernel modules were the only issue,
On 25 Sep 2002 22:32:32 -0400
Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> > I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has
> > gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version.
> > AFAIK this shouldn'
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote:
> I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has
> gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version.
> AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to the users since the key issue
> is that the kernel modules
Hi Jose
> I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So
>now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose
>any problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are compiled
>with the same version of gcc
Hi guys. Yep, vacations ended.
I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now
forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any
problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are compiled with
the s
25 matches
Mail list logo
