I'm getting referred-to-moderator messages for dri-patches on cvs commits,
still...
Keith
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 20:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> I'm getting referred-to-moderator messages for dri-patches on cvs commits,
> still...
It was still restricted to subscribers only, now it should be everybody
@users.sourceforge.net .
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:31:03PM +0200, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> > I've been a bit slack with it recently, so the numbers of
> > posts have just
> > been sitting there. You get daily reminders of how many are
> > in the queue
> > waiting for your attention too. But to be managed properly you ne
urihane; Keith Whitwell
> Cc: Michel Dänzer; Dan; Alexander Stohr;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Dri-devel] spam collection of the past few days
>
>
> > I've been a bit slack with it recently, so the numbers of
> > posts have just
> > been sittin
> I've been a bit slack with it recently, so the numbers of
> posts have just
> been sitting there. You get daily reminders of how many are
> in the queue
> waiting for your attention too. But to be managed properly you need to
> tend to them on a daily basis.
>
> Alan
I have no problem taking
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:46:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michel Dnzer wrote:
> >On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:23, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:17:03PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
> >>
> >>>Anyway, many possible solutions have been discussed; if only the list
> >>>admi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:46:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michel Dnzer wrote:
> >On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:23, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:17:03PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
> >>
> >>>Anyway, many possible solutions have been discussed; if only the list
> >>>admi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:39:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:23, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:17:03PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Anyway, many possible solutions have been discussed; if only the list
> > > admin(s) cared to at least c
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:23, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:17:03PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Anyway, many possible solutions have been discussed; if only the list
admin(s) cared to at least comment on them.
I'm the list admin.
Thanks for speaking up.
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:23, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:17:03PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, many possible solutions have been discussed; if only the list
> > admin(s) cared to at least comment on them.
>
> I'm the list admin.
Thanks for speaking up.
> And
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:17:03PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:05, Dan wrote:
> > Alexander Stohr wrote:
> >
> > >In response to the attached list of spam
> > >(18 spam e-mails to dri-devel in only 3 days!)
> > >i have to ask if the dri-devel mailing list
> > >can now
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:05, Dan wrote:
> Alexander Stohr wrote:
>
> >In response to the attached list of spam
> >(18 spam e-mails to dri-devel in only 3 days!)
> >i have to ask if the dri-devel mailing list
> >can now be set to subscribers-only policy?
>
> Oh, for the love of God, YES!
> I am
Alexander Stohr wrote:
In response to the attached list of spam
(18 spam e-mails to dri-devel in only 3 days!)
i have to ask if the dri-devel mailing list
can now be set to subscribers-only policy?
Oh, for the love of God, YES!
I am subscribed to 11 mailing lists, and I get more SPAM from dri
José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:52:45AM +0200, Alexander Stohr wrote:
In response to the attached list of spam
(18 spam e-mails to dri-devel in only 3 days!)
i have to ask if the dri-devel mailing list
can now be set to subscribers-only policy?
i dont feel thats any longer accept
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:52:45AM +0200, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> In response to the attached list of spam
> (18 spam e-mails to dri-devel in only 3 days!)
> i have to ask if the dri-devel mailing list
> can now be set to subscribers-only policy?
>
> i dont feel thats any longer acceptable.
> t
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:52:45AM +0200, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> In response to the attached list of spam
> (18 spam e-mails to dri-devel in only 3 days!)
> i have to ask if the dri-devel mailing list
> can now be set to subscribers-only policy?
Notice that removing html only mail as well as m
In response to the attached list of spam
(18 spam e-mails to dri-devel in only 3 days!)
i have to ask if the dri-devel mailing list
can now be set to subscribers-only policy?
i dont feel thats any longer acceptable.
that daily mailbox digging is really a hoax.
-Alex.
From: Myrtle Elliot [mail
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] Spam on this list, list email addresses are out in the open.
Set ML submission to moderated for non-subscribers
and few persons that check the backlog regularily.
Further add e.g. a 24 hours timeout (if possible),
so that nothing gets stuck unclassified forever.
This
Howzit?
Having noticed the spam on this list, when I was working on the Mailing list
page ( subscribe / unsubscribe / preferences ) this struck me as odd:
"To send mail to the list send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Now is this not vulnerable to email harvesting web bots which makes the list
more likel
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:34:22PM -0400, Jon Niehof wrote:
> Did anyone else get spam apparently harvested from this list?
>
Yes, I goofed and approved a piece of spam that put in the moderation
queue. Your addresses have not been picked up.
I shouldn't go through the queue when I'm still waki
Did anyone else get spam apparently harvested from this list?
--Jon, N9RUJ[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.calvin.edu/~jnieho38
Let the truth of Love be lighted
Let the love of Truth shine clear
--Rush, Hemispheres: The Sphere
___
Dri-devel mailing list
21 matches
Mail list logo
