> 1) Requires special parser which is too syntax sensitive
> 2) Users editing the file could hose it rather easily compared to
>existing formats.
Ja I know I was teasing the "We want XML" crowd by going to the extreme in
the opposite direction, trying to pull them back to the centre.
> Fo
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Smitty wrote:
>How about this for something which can be edited by a GUI program which
>can change the settings, and which I / you / world+dog can read,
>understand and edit easily in a text editor?
>
>GUI *and* CLI editable without having to squint at it.
>
>Anyone see any p
