On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 07:41, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 23:15, Mike Mestnik wrote:
>
> > 2. There is no suported flag, so DRM_SUP can go.
>
> Well, it removes the ability for a platform to simply not have
> __REALLY_HAVE_SG (for example, this was the case on FreeBSD for quite a
>
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 23:15, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> It was a copy/past job. I'm working on rewriting a lot of it, the main point of the
>patch is to
> get devfs working. The pci ids are only needed if there is more than one card(under
>linux) and
> the code was copied from BSD so I just assumed
It was a copy/past job. I'm working on rewriting a lot of it, the main point of the
patch is to
get devfs working. The pci ids are only needed if there is more than one card(under
linux) and
the code was copied from BSD so I just assumed that things would work there also.
I'm going to rewrite
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 21:33, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I patched my devfs patch so it can be used with the r200 branch. This was needed
>b/c my original
> patch depended upon the shared structure introduced for BSD. BTW dose the R200 work
>on BSD?
My only concerns with your devfs patch (this one/
Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I patched my devfs patch so it can be used with the r200 branch. This was needed
>b/c my original
> patch depended upon the shared structure introduced for BSD. BTW dose the R200 work
>on BSD?
>
I've got the bsd changes merged in my local cvs. I need to build a test bo
.net dri-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Dri-devel] R200-0-1-branch devfs patch.
> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 20:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
>
> I patched my devfs patch so it can be used with the r200 branch. This was needed
>b/c my
> original
> patch depended upon the shared str
I patched my devfs patch so it can be used with the r200 branch. This was needed b/c
my original
patch depended upon the shared structure introduced for BSD. BTW dose the R200 work
on BSD?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price
