On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 03:44, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Is your latest code available somewhere?
The latest code is still at:
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/sysdrm-2002-05-13.tar.gz
(Haven't worked on it for a bit, waiting for decisions on what's going
to happen with it).
--
Eric Anholt <
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:22:52PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > > I've got some time to take a look at this over the next couple of days. It
> > > really depends how big the differences are - but probably we need to come up
> > > with a way of doing things without too much #ifdef crud in t
> > I've got some time to take a look at this over the next couple of days. It
> > really depends how big the differences are - but probably we need to come up
> > with a way of doing things without too much #ifdef crud in the main code --
> > whether this means we need an abstraction layer, mor
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:59, Jens Owen wrote:
> > > Eric,
> > >
> > > The watermark I would apply for measuring the success of OS-templating
> > > is device indepedence. If all device specific code can go into the
> > > shared/drm/kernel direc
Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:59, Jens Owen wrote:
> > Eric,
> >
> > The watermark I would apply for measuring the success of OS-templating
> > is device indepedence. If all device specific code can go into the
> > shared/drm/kernel directory and only device independent code is
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:59, Jens Owen wrote:
> Eric,
>
> The watermark I would apply for measuring the success of OS-templating
> is device indepedence. If all device specific code can go into the
> shared/drm/kernel directory and only device independent code is found in
> the OS specific dire
Eric Anholt wrote:
> I would like to see a form of OS-templated code get into CVS. If the
> rest of the DRI developers are interested in having this done, this is
> what I would like to happen:
>
> Step 1:
> - repocopy most of linux/drm/kernel/ to shared/drm/kernel (see below)
> - make the buil
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:13, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Does the code you've linked implement these (or some of these) changes? Or is
> it the current bsd-only code. (I haven't looked at it yet)
>
> Keith
sending back to the group since I was probably unclear.
The linked code is the current OS-te
Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> As most of you know, I've been working on the BSD DRM for a year or so
> now. I've been working on the code based on bsd-2-0-0-branch, which
> uses C macros and ifdefs to deal with the differences between Linux and
> FreeBSD. To see the current state of the code checked i
As most of you know, I've been working on the BSD DRM for a year or so
now. I've been working on the code based on bsd-2-0-0-branch, which
uses C macros and ifdefs to deal with the differences between Linux and
FreeBSD. To see the current state of the code checked into FreeBSD CVS
(it's close to
10 matches
Mail list logo
