Re: [Dri-devel] Linux vs. Windows Quake3 Demo Benchmarks

2001-05-01 Thread Kreuzritter2000
> Could you try rereunning one or two of your tests without sound to see > if there is a difference? > In console: > s_initsound 0 > snd_restart > Regards, > matt Ok, here are the benchmarks at Normal Detail Benchmark without Sound: 640*480: demo001 frames sec

Re: [Dri-devel] Linux vs. Windows Quake3 Demo Benchmarks

2001-05-01 Thread Brian Paul
Kreuzritter2000 wrote: > > Hello > > I made some Benchmark comparisons with my Video card under WinME and Linux, > here are the resulst: > > Perhaps using the new tdfx driver branch 3.1, DRI inbuild Mesa 3.5 and Kernel 2.4 >could be a little > bit faster. It might be a bit faster but I haven'

[Dri-devel] Linux vs. Windows Quake3 Demo Benchmarks

2001-05-01 Thread Kreuzritter2000
Hello I made some Benchmark comparisons with my Video card under WinME and Linux, here are the resulst: Perhaps using the new tdfx driver branch 3.1, DRI inbuild Mesa 3.5 and Kernel 2.4 could be a little bit faster. Linux vs. WindowsME Quake3