Minor correction.
Opps: 002
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This function's use is not consistant betwean drivers, I think this code
> should
> change vary littl from driver to driver. I have a fue questions about the
> use
> of DestroyTexObj.
>
>
> This lookes valid to me. Maby
This function's use is not consistant betwean drivers, I think this code should
change vary littl from driver to driver. I have a fue questions about the use
of DestroyTexObj.
This lookes valid to me. Maby to remove later redundancy this should be in
SwapOutTexObj? Right now this only appers
At this point all the drivers seam to have there own little quirks. The radeon
driver being vary difrent from the rest. The mga driver is missing code like
that of r128_context.c Line 199. I am wondering if we need both Destroy AND
SwapOut, could there not be just a genaric Remove that would de
