Re: [Dri-devel] Another cvs policy question

2003-10-08 Thread Keith Whitwell
Felix Kühling wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:38:04 +0100 Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Felix Kühling wrote: Hi, I have a working copy of the config-0-0-1-branch with the trunk merged in now. According to the CVS policy I would have to commit this to the branch. However, this would be

Re: [Dri-devel] Another cvs policy question

2003-10-08 Thread Felix Kühling
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:38:04 +0100 Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix Kühling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a working copy of the config-0-0-1-branch with the trunk merged > > in now. According to the CVS policy I would have to commit this to the > > branch. However, this would be

Re: [Dri-devel] Another cvs policy question

2003-10-08 Thread Keith Whitwell
Felix Kühling wrote: Hi, I have a working copy of the config-0-0-1-branch with the trunk merged in now. According to the CVS policy I would have to commit this to the branch. However, this would be a huge commit due to the intermediate merge from XFree86. cvs diff -uN outputs a 323074-lines patch

[Dri-devel] Another cvs policy question

2003-10-08 Thread Felix Kühling
Hi, I have a working copy of the config-0-0-1-branch with the trunk merged in now. According to the CVS policy I would have to commit this to the branch. However, this would be a huge commit due to the intermediate merge from XFree86. cvs diff -uN outputs a 323074-lines patch (11 MB). I believe it