> I have never tried WineX myselves in recent times
> but i am confident that the next ATI Linux driver release
> will address that thing so that this conflict is solved.
>
> -Alex.
When is the next release going be? Any guesstimations?
Joe
---
Alexander Stohr wrote:
WineX is clobbering a register that the OpenGL part
of the driver has already sort of "claimed"?
Then their software is sort of "broken". ;-)
I very respectfully disagree. If I'm not mistaken, fs is one of the
registers that the Linux ABI lists as callee-saved, just like
o that this conflict is solved.
-Alex.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ove Kaaven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 20:25
> To: Alexander Stohr
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Dri-devel] ATI reference drivers
>
>
>
tir, 2003-02-11 kl. 12:26 skrev Alexander Stohr:
> development for the Linux platform has not stopped,
> surely not, it is just that there were no releases
> in the last two months or so. i have to admit that
> there were some problems as for any driver out there,
> but none was so fundamental seri
]
Subject: RE: [Dri-devel] ATI reference drivers
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 11:26, Alexander Stohr wrote:
9500 is a r300 based design and is nicely supported.
9100 is a r200 based design and is nicely supported.
(or at least it should be quite nicely supported -
just assumed because i dont have such a
ander Stohr
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Dri-devel] ATI reference drivers
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 11:26, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> > > 9500 is a r300 based design and is nicely supported.
> > > 9100 is a r200 based design and is n
i dont know about that.
i cant verify, i have no such hardware.
-Alex.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 13:59
> To: Alexander Stohr
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Dri-devel] ATI reference driv
hands,
so i cant test anything at all with that.
-Alex.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 13:59
> To: Alexander Stohr
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Dri-devel] ATI reference drivers
>
>
&g
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 11:26, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> 9500 is a r300 based design and is nicely supported.
> 9100 is a r200 based design and is nicely supported.
> (or at least it should be quite nicely supported -
> just assumed because i dont have such a board to my hands.)
Do you know what the
> I really would like to buy an ATI card (9100 or 9500), but
> with no driver
> support I'll have to stay with Nvidia cards.
>
> Hope you have some info for me.
>
> Best regards
> Michael Born
9500 is a r300 based design and is nicely supported.
9100 is a r200 based design and is nicely suppor
Please excuse my not very DRI related question.
Is there an official statement from ATI regarding the product cycle of their
binary 3D drivers for Linux x86?
In an interview at www.sharkyextreme.com an ATI person stated that they will
release 8-10 Windows driver over the year.
Their Linux drive
11 matches
Mail list logo
