Re: [Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 12:44, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > I currently get an oops on client shutdown when radeon_mem_release() is > > called on the agp_heap, which isn't initialized. Probably is in your local > > tree? :) > > I've added guards to catch uninited heaps. Th

Re: [Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fre, 2002-09-20 at 19:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >>Garry Reisky wrote: >> >>>I know Keith said he didn't want much feedback on this branch becaues it >>>could be breaking severly. I just wanted to say great job on the latest >>>checkins. >>> >>The breakages should be r

Re: [Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-22 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Son, 2002-09-22 at 19:18, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >>Michel Dänzer wrote: >> >>>I currently get an oops on client shutdown when radeon_mem_release() is >>>called on the agp_heap, which isn't initialized. Probably is in your local >>>tree? :) >>> > > Ah, the RADEON_INIT_H

Re: [Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-22 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2002-09-22 at 19:18, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > I currently get an oops on client shutdown when radeon_mem_release() is > > called on the agp_heap, which isn't initialized. Probably is in your local > > tree? :) Ah, the RADEON_INIT_HEAP ioctl needs to be called

Re: [Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-22 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fre, 2002-09-20 at 19:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >>Garry Reisky wrote: >> >>>I know Keith said he didn't want much feedback on this branch becaues it >>>could be breaking severly. I just wanted to say great job on the latest >>>checkins. >>> >>The breakages should be r

Re: [Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-22 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2002-09-20 at 19:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Garry Reisky wrote: > > I know Keith said he didn't want much feedback on this branch becaues it > > could be breaking severly. I just wanted to say great job on the latest > > checkins. > > The breakages should be reducing now (hopefully). I

Re: [Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-20 Thread Keith Whitwell
Garry Reisky wrote: > I know Keith said he didn't want much feedback on this branch becaues it > could be breaking severly. I just wanted to say great job on the latest > checkins. The breakages should be reducing now (hopefully). I didn't do some of the more radical stuff I thought I might hav

[Dri-devel] 200-0-2-branch

2002-09-20 Thread Garry Reisky
I know Keith said he didn't want much feedback on this branch becaues it could be breaking severly. I just wanted to say great job on the latest checkins. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkge