Sorry, I don't know why we are cross posting and including subscribers in
CC. This belongs on the DRI list, as it is only with 3rd party DRI-client
code that the problem exists.
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:07:11 +0200, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Maw, 2004-09-07 at 10:07, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> Also, what happens to r200 users who happen to use Debian? Using dri
> cvs snapshots
If Debian is currently shipping a buggy driver then Debian needs to ship
a working driver. Same as anyone else. You'll also need the newest
dri driver for Ra
Mike Mestnik wrote:
Most IMPORTANT is that some-one some-where there is a list of ALL of
these. These are best in the form of code comments so the the respective
places in the code can be changed.
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dose the DRM varify that the cmds are in this order? Why
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 05:07:45 -0400, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lots of badly formatted text.
I do apologize for anyone who had to read that.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd
al
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 14:12:08 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can test the r200_dri.so from the snapshot with the DRM from the
> kernel...
And drum roll please...
The dri cvs snapshot works fine on both it's own kernel module, and
the one that comes
with 2.6.8.1. So now what?
Most IMPORTANT is that some-one some-where there is a list of ALL of
these. These are best in the form of code comments so the the respective
places in the code can be changed.
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dose the DRM varify that the cmds are in this order? Why not just
> hav
--- Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400
> Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> [snip]
> > >
> > > That shouldn't matter, should it? The userland stuff should never
> lock
> > > the machine u
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 07:01 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How to fix this is a pretty hot topic now.
>
> Yow, I didn't mean to cause such an upset. ;)
>
> Currently, the dri cvs snapshot for 20040905 doesn't compile
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to fix this is a pretty hot topic now.
Yow, I didn't mean to cause such an upset. ;)
Currently, the dri cvs snapshot for 20040905 doesn't compile with
2.6.8.1 for me (I've sent
a bug report to the dri-devel mailing li
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400
Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18, Patrick McFarland wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > That shouldn't matter, should it? The userland stuff should never lock
> > the machine up.
> > I'll test it anyhow, though.
>
> No, it shouldn't. Anyth
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:40:54 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 04:22 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > > On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Whe
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:25:00 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > That shouldn't matter, should it? The userland stuff should never lock
> > the machine up.
>
> In an ideal world... Feel free to track down the cause and a
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:40:54 -0400, Michel DÃnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 04:22 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > > On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel DÃnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:40:54 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 04:22 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Where did you get r200_dri.so from?
> >
> > From the one that comes
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 04:22 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel DÃnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Where did you get r200_dri.so from?
>
> From the one that comes with the Deb X I mentioned above.
Please try something newer, e.g. my xlibmesa-gl1-dr
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:59:12 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you insmod the radeon drm module with drm_opts=debug do the test and
> send on the trace, it may be getting wedged somewhere unexpected...
Here you go, but it doesn't look like it has output anything interesti
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 16:36 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:14:55 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What version of the DRI driver?
> >
> > Where do I look for that?
>
> Wh
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 16:36 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:14:55 -0400, Michel DÃnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What version of the DRI driver?
>
> Where do I look for that?
Where did you get r200_dri.so from?
--
Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:14:55 -0400, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What version of the DRI driver?
Where do I look for that?
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd
all be running around in
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 05:16 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
>
> All of this was tested with a virgin 2.6.8.1 (with debug info and
> frame pointers enabled) and Debian's XFree86 4.3.0.1, [...]
What version of the DRI driver?
--
Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI deve
Can you insmod the radeon drm module with drm_opts=debug do the test and
send on the trace, it may be getting wedged somewhere unexpected...
Dave.
>
> All of this was tested with a virgin 2.6.8.1 (with debug info and
> frame pointers enabled) and Debian's XFree86 4.3.0.1, using DarkPlaces
> and
I'm currently using an r200 (specifically, an agp 'ATI Technologies
Inc Radeon R200 QM [Radeon 9100]') on a uniproc Pentium 3 board
equipped with an intel 440bx/piix4 type chipset (the agp controller is
identified as 'Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev
03)'
All of this was tes
22 matches
Mail list logo
