http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13683
--- Comment #29 from Alex Deucher 2009-11-30 07:28:09
---
Created an attachment (id=23974)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23974)
grab misc mode info for lvds
Does this patch help?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.k
>From 0d49d381d6749dc3013527b369c83ef31852ce4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:40:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms/atom: pull misc mode info for lvds
from bios tables
sync polarity, etc. This will likely fix LVDS problems
on some laptops.
Signed-off
On Sunday 29 November 2009 19:51:55 Robert Noland wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 15:36 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > I believe that moving away from the current model makes it more
> > difficult
> > to "... spread the burden ...", hence my objections. If you want to
> > call
> > that ranting or compl
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354
--- Comment #5 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 20:13:57 PST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> gpu_draw.c:1298 line contains following call:
> glMatrixMode(GL_TEXTURE);
The current SVN version of the file gpu_draw.c is available at
https://svn.bl
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354
--- Comment #4 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 20:04:40 PST
---
Here is a backtrace obtained by Sami Pelkonen on T41 laptop with ATI Radeon
Mobility 9000 (M9) Lf (AGP). Compiz disabled and glxgears also works.
Compiled Blender SVN version (241
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354
--- Comment #3 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 20:00:13 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=31570)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31570)
glxinfo.txt
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354
--- Comment #2 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 19:59:46 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=31569)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31569)
lspci -vvnn
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354
--- Comment #1 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 19:59:17 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=31568)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31568)
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354
Summary: Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000-
9200)
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Sev
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 15:36 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> I believe that moving away from the current model makes it more
> difficult
> to "... spread the burden ...", hence my objections. If you want to
> call
> that ranting or complaining, so be it.
We no longer get to share the burden with the mu
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:03 PM, vehemens wrote:
> On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:36:51 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote:
>> > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote:
>> > >
>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:03:51PM -0800, vehemens wrote:
> You missing the point as is rnoland. Just because the linux DRM developers
> stopped using a centralized repository, didn't mean FreeBSD shouldn't as the
> intial integration work would be still shared reducing the burden on any one
>
On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:36:51 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > Your missing the point of usin
On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote:
> On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Your missing the point of using a development structure which supports
> > > collobration.
> >
> > [snip
On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Your missing the point of using a development structure which supports
> > collobration.
>
> [snip]
>
> > The difference is that you are the only one doing the work now
On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote:
[snip]
> Your missing the point of using a development structure which supports
> collobration.
[snip]
> The difference is that you are the only one doing the work now.
[snip]
> Again, your missing the point of using a development structure
On Sunday 29 November 2009 10:39:34 Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> I enjoy playing the devils advocate occasionally, so take this with a
> grain of salt.
>
> My understanding is that there are roughly 3 bsd kernels that support
> drm userspace interface(free*, open* and netbsd?), each has 1 or 2
> maint
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25346
--- Comment #1 from Aidan Marks 2009-11-29 13:09:28 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=31557)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31557)
kwin_extraneous_example2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cg
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25346
Summary: kwin extraneous transparent boxes
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Componen
I enjoy playing the devils advocate occasionally, so take this with a
grain of salt.
My understanding is that there are roughly 3 bsd kernels that support
drm userspace interface(free*, open* and netbsd?), each has 1 or 2
maintainers. For better or worse the linux guys/girls have gone their
own wa
On Sunday 29 November 2009 07:07:41 Robert Noland wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:40 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:38 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 28 November 2009 10:41:39 Robert Noland wrote:
>
On Sunday 29 November 2009 00:31:17 Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:40:55PM -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote:
> > > Because unpublished work doesn't exist That goes for the work that
> > > I've done that isn't yet publ
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24611
Pierre Ossman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31547|0 |1
is obsolete|
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:40 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:38 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > > On Saturday 28 November 2009 10:41:39 Robert Noland wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:23 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > > >
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24611
--- Comment #14 from Pierre Ossman 2009-11-29
03:26:03 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=31547)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31547)
radeon-crtc-off.patch
More testing has narrowed it down to the requirement that it's
[email protected] wrote:
> Hello Sirs:
> This patch is to add the interface to communicate with V4L and DDMPEG.
>
> Signed-off-by Bruce C. Chang
>
> diff -ruN old/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dma.c new/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dma.c
> --- old/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dma.c 2009-10-22 10:42:10.00
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:41 AM, wrote:
>
>> From: Thomas Schlichter
>>
>> The VIA DRM module is able to accelerate 2D video on the VX800 chipset,
>> thus add the corresponding PCI ID. Accelerated 3D video is not
>> implemented.
>>
>> The modified VIA DRM module was test
[email protected] wrote:
> Hello Sirs:
> This patch is to add the support of ACPI suspend/resume. Some information
> locating in video memory
> need to be saved for 3D function. The mesa driver source has been release on
> VIA Linux portal
> (http://linux.via.com.tw/support/beginDownload
[email protected] wrote:
> Hello Sirs:
> This patch is to solve the video hang issue caused by verification
> function. These 3 patches has been verified in (1) CX700M platform (2) CLE266
> platform (3) K8M800 platform (4) CN400 platform with UniChrome/OpenChrome
> driver except few of t
Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I moved the allocation until after the check for (si->totalhigh == 0).
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
>
> --- orig/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_memory.c 2009-11-28 07:05:54.0
> +0200
> +++ devel/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_memory.c2009-
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:40:55PM -0800, vehemens wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote:
> > Because unpublished work doesn't exist That goes for the work that
> > I've done that isn't yet published as well. Until it is in the hands of
> > someone besides you
31 matches
Mail list logo
