http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21051
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 16:56 -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> One small change: if writeback test is disabled say 'writeback test
> disabled' instead of 'writeback disabled'.
No, it's really about disabling the writeback of the ring head pointer
and scratch register contents (not 'microcode writeback'),
[ mesa3d-dev is more appropriate I think ]
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 16:38 -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > So that means that I can get hardware acceleration by writing the winsys
> > for Syllable, regardless of the fact that we don't use DRI/DRM?? I guess
>
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20869
Eric Anholt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20869
--- Comment #1 from Eric Anholt 2009-04-05 19:31:05 PST ---
Works fine for me as far as I can tell with Mesa master. Please provide the
information requested in http://intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html
to see if we can reproduce
Ok, that sounds good.? What we have right now is a very simple 2d driver API
that basically blits bitmaps from userspace to the screen.? Our drivers have a
duality system.? They use a kernel driver for basic access to the card, but for
many drivers, almost everything is MMIO, so the kernel dri
[email protected] wrote:
> Sounds good, but here's the catch, I would like to use Gallium to accelerate
> the whole windowing system.? I want our windowing system to use libGL for all
> rendering, so Gallium would basically be running on the video card with no
> windowing system sta
Sounds good, but here's the catch, I would like to use Gallium to accelerate
the whole windowing system.? I want our windowing system to use libGL for all
rendering, so Gallium would basically be running on the video card with no
windowing system standing in the way.
Dee
-Origina
So that means that I can get hardware acceleration by writing the winsys for
Syllable, regardless of the fact that we don't use DRI/DRM?? I guess the main
question is, "Do I have to use the DRI/DRM drivers in order to use the current
hardware pipes?"
Dee
-Original Message-
Fr
[email protected] wrote:
> So that means that I can get hardware acceleration by writing the winsys for
> Syllable, regardless of the fact that we don't use DRI/DRM?? I guess the main
> question is, "Do I have to use the DRI/DRM drivers in order to use the
> current hardware pipes?"
Right now, in order to create a driver, you need to combine three pieces.
The pipe is the core of acceleration for a given chipset. It contains
all of the code necessary to accelerate things, and exposes two generic
structs in the Gallium API: pipe_screen, which is information about the
current ch
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21065
--- Comment #1 from Reenen 2009-04-05 14:00:51 PST ---
As soon as the textures bugs, I get this message in the console:
fixme:d3d:WineD3D_ChoosePixelFormat Add OpenGL context recreation support to
SetDepthStencilSurface
--
Configure bugma
One small change: if writeback test is disabled say 'writeback test
disabled' instead of 'writeback disabled'.
Matt
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch removes the case where something silly like the
> following could be printed to dmesg.
>
> [drm] wri
I'm not sure which list is the correct one to post these questions, so I'm
posting to both.? All diagrams of the Gallium architecture show the ability of
using Gallium in various OS's that are completely different with each other.?
However, each diagram that has a specific graphics chipset (i915
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21065
Summary: Dungeon Siege Textures done work (through Wine - Compiz
disabled)
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NE
Hi,
The attached patch removes the case where something silly like the
following could be printed to dmesg.
[drm] writeback test failed
[drm] writeback forced off
Please commit (I don't have commit access).
Thanks,
Matt Turner
0001-radeon-Don-t-print-results-of-microcode-writeback-i.patch
De
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12836
--- Comment #1 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-04-05 10:54:22 ---
On Monday 16 March 2009, Frank Seidel wrote:
> Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Hmm. Does switching to and then back from a virtual terminal also break?
>
> I think i have the same probl
17 matches
Mail list logo