Moving libdrm out of drm.git seems like a good idea to me. Sure they
are different sides of the same coin but drm and libdrm should have
their own physical git repos. It makes things a little cleaner in my
eyes. It also makes things easier for git noobs.
-Ryan
On 2/28/09, vehemens wrote:
> On Sa
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 19:24 +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Sat, 28 February 2009 Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > The kernel deadlocked on struct_mutex, did it not? That's a kernel
> > > bug regardless of what userspace you're running.
> > >
On Saturday 28 February 2009 05:28:38 am Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:54:21 -0800
>
> vehemens wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel,
On Saturday 28 February 2009 09:06:38 am Robert C. Noland III wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:54 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel,
On Sat, 28 February 2009 Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The kernel deadlocked on struct_mutex, did it not? That's a kernel
> > bug regardless of what userspace you're running.
> >
> > Do we know why this happened?
>
> Userland went stomping all
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> The kernel deadlocked on struct_mutex, did it not? That's a kernel bug
> regardless of what userspace you're running.
No, it didn't deadlock on struct_mutex, it deadlocked because the
hardware got wedged, and we still don't know how to un
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:54 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal
> > > life leading to reduced time availability (
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:54:21 -0800
vehemens wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal
> > > life leading to reduced time availability
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19484
--- Comment #15 from Michel Dänzer 2009-02-28 05:06:29
PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Should I close this bug?
Not until the bug has been found and fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
On 28.2.2009 01:20, Eric Anholt wrote:
> KMS support is not a feature of the server but of your 2D driver. You
> want 2.6.2, or things will be bad.
I have 2.5.0. After turning KMS off, problem seems to be solved.
Anyway, I would appreciate a version of the intel driver being in the
Kconfig text
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:49:06PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 27.2.2009 14:04, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:32:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:28:51 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >>
> >>>everytime I run X, it gets stuck. Currently running on mmotm
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19484
--- Comment #14 from Mikko C. 2009-02-28 04:47:26 PST ---
So I'm guessing there's no real solution yet? Beside disabling that option.
Should I close this bug?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19484
--- Comment #13 from Michel Dänzer 2009-02-28 03:38:22
PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Instead, Option "ExaOptimizeMigration" "off" does solve it.
> What's the drawback in disabling this?
Potentially lower performance due to more pixmap
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7770
--- Comment #39 from Michel Dänzer 2009-02-28 02:39:42
PST ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> The bad news is that it's highly unstable. I mean, you can query information
> with glxinfo without a problem, but don't try a GL screensaver or play w
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:31:28 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> > On 28.2.2009 01:20, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > KMS support is not a feature of the server but of your 2D driver. You
> > > want 2.6.2, or things will be bad.
> >
> > I have 2.5.0.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:31:28 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 28.2.2009 01:20, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > KMS support is not a feature of the server but of your 2D driver. You
> > want 2.6.2, or things will be bad.
>
> I have 2.5.0. After turning KMS off, problem seems to be solved.
>
> Anyway, I woul
16 matches
Mail list logo
