On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:35:59 +1100
>
>> Oh BTW something else to be careful with, though I suppose it's working
>> some what by accident right now... when the GART is in the frame buffer
>> it gets applied th
drm: ati_pcigart: Fix limit check in drm_ati_pcigart_init().
The variable 'max_pages' is ambiguous. There are two concepts
of "pages" being used in this function.
First, we have ATI GART pages which are always 4096 bytes.
Then, we have system pages which are of size PAGE_SIZE.
Eliminate the co
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:35:59 +1100
> Oh BTW something else to be careful with, though I suppose it's working
> some what by accident right now... when the GART is in the frame buffer
> it gets applied the current fb swapper setting... ouch !
>
> So it might be a g
Lifted from the DDX modesetting.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c|8
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 20 ++--
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --
They used to be different. Now they're identical.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 33 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/inte
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 94c7c09..4f54ac5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_displ
We need to hold the struct_mutex around pinning and the phys object
operations.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |9 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
On Friday, February 13, 2009 4:18 pm Peter John Garrone wrote:
> In reply to Jesse Barnes post.
> I'm not on top of the finer details, being a consumer rather than a
> developer. I have the following queries:
>
> 1) Is the buffer flip to be synchronous in the hardware, or to be
> implemented as a s
In reply to Jesse Barnes post.
I'm not on top of the finer details, being a consumer rather than a
developer. I have the following queries:
1) Is the buffer flip to be synchronous in the hardware, or to be
implemented as a software interrupt?
2) By fullscreen, do you mean covering one or all scre
On Friday, February 13, 2009 9:28 am Diego Calleja wrote:
> On Lunes 09 Febrero 2009 09:30:57 Dave Airlie escribió:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Please pull the 'drm-fixes' branch from
> > ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git
> > drm-fixes
>
> A commit from this merge is ca
On Friday, February 13, 2009 2:33 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > It does, but take a look at that code again. If interrupts are disabled
> > by the timer, we'll capture the frame count. If, sometime later, they're
> > re-enabled, we'll end up
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:37 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Avoids leaking fbs and associated buffers on release.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg
Tested-by: Chris Wilson
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC)
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:11 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:29 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> > > The current wait_vblank condition won't return if the wait sequence is
> > > more than 8M behind the current count
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12385
--- Comment #8 from Michel Dänzer 2009-02-13 00:28:38 PST
---
FWIW, current xserver has a patch which allows the driver to return ~0ULL to
indicate that the pixmap can't be used directly.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17723
--- Comment #52 from Michel Dänzer 2009-02-13 00:26:18
PST ---
Finally got around to pushing the xf86-video-ati patch to Git, so it'll be in
the 6.11 release. Can this report be closed?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/us
15 matches
Mail list logo