[Bug 12028] i915 DRM is broken in 2.6.28-rc4

2008-11-22 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 13:37 --- Notify-Also : Dylan Taft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12078] New: DRI hangs for kernels above 2.6.24 on system wiht two graphics cards.

2008-11-22 Thread Andrew Morton
fyi.. On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:26:47 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12078 > >Summary: DRI hangs for kernels above 2.6.24 on system wiht two > graphics cards. >Product: Platform Specific/Hardware >

[BISECTED] aspire one [i945GM] fails to resume from ram in 2.6.28-rc1 and above

2008-11-22 Thread Nadejda Levitsky
If I suspend the system with compiz running, on resume from ram or disk I only see the wallpaper and mouse, usually can move the mouse, and I can't do anything else. Sometimes system resume operation after few minutes, sometimes not. The offending commit is: 0a3e67a4caac273a3bfc4ced3da364830b1a

[Bug 11868] agpgart-intel fails on gigabyte ga-g31mf-s1 board with low (1+1megabyte shared ram) chipset framebuffer size

2008-11-22 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11868 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #

[Bug 10985] backlight doesn't come on after resume with i915 video

2008-11-22 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985 --- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 08:13 --- I've just had an email from someone who has reproduced this on a thinkpad x30. My understanding is that Jesse has confirmed this and has access to x40 hardware now. -- Conf

Re: Waiting for vblank vs VT switching

2008-11-22 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:32 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 23:14 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > No, radeon doesn't (un)install the IRQ handler on VT switch. > > It's not a matter of uninstalling the IRQ handler; Yes, it is. > the question is whether the hardware frame co