Re: [RFC] full suspend/resume support for i915 DRM driver

2007-10-19 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:01 pm Jesse Barnes wrote: > We seem to see a lot of bug reports along the lines of, "my machine > resumes but I can't see X" or, "I can see X but only with a bright > flashlight", etc. These sorts of problems are due to the fact that > the X server isn't designed to

Re: [patch] post superioctl inteface removal.

2007-10-19 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi. Eric Anholt wrote: >On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 07:55 +0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > >>On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:40 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: >> >> >> >>>Turn off CRTCs >>>Unpin old framebuffer >>>Allocate new framebuffer >>>Copy from old to new >>> >>> >>We needn't copy on resize, leavi

Re: [patch] post superioctl inteface removal.

2007-10-19 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 03:04 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote: > Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > > On 10/18/07, Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > > >>> Doesn't Kristian changes to DRI interface (DRI2) already allow to > >>> clients to not care > >>> about front buffer. I mean if they all

[Bug 8357] Rendering with r300 right of 2650px width is disstorted

2007-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8357 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-05 10:53 PST --- It looks like you are right, becouse I could get opengl working up to ~2650 pixels. So anyone knows why we need this magic with R300_CLIPRECT_OFFSET in r300_cmdbuf.c in drm?