Re: [PATCH]: drm: cleanup DRM_DEBUG() parameters

2007-10-17 Thread Németh Márton
From: Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As DRM_DEBUG macro already prints out the __FUNCTION__ string (see drivers/char/drm/drmP.h), it is not worth doing this again. At some other places the ending "\n" was added. Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -uprN linux-2.6.23-mm1.o

Re: [PATCH]: drm: cleanup DRM_DEBUG() parameters

2007-10-17 Thread Németh Márton
From: Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As DRM_DEBUG macro already prints out the __FUNCTION__ string (see drivers/char/drm/drmP.h), it is not worth doing this again. At some other places the ending "\n" was added. Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -uprN linux-2.6.23-mm1.o

[Bug 11131] Mesa 6.5.2 implementation error: i915_program_error: Exceeded max nr indirect texture lookups

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11131 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Drivers/DRI/i810|Drivers/DRI/i915 -- Configure bug

Re: [patch] post superioctl inteface removal.

2007-10-17 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:40 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > Turn off CRTCs > Unpin old framebuffer > Allocate new framebuffer > Copy from old to new We needn't copy on resize, leaving us with allocate new, unpin old, pin new, free old. Seems like this would avoid some of the worst issues. -- [EMAI

Re: [patch] post superioctl inteface removal.

2007-10-17 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 11:32 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: > Dave Airlie wrote: > >> DRM_BO_HINT_DONT_FENCE is implied, and use that instead of the set pin > >> interface. We can perhaps rename it to drmBOSetStatus or something more > >> suitable. > >> > >> This will get rid of the user-space unf

[Bug 12838] Fix drm regression tests

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12838 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 12838] Fix drm regression tests

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12838 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-17 13:14 PST --- Created an attachment (id=12090) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=12090&action=view) [Patch] Fix regression tests -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.fr

[Bug 12838] New: Fix drm regression tests

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12838 Summary: Fix drm regression tests Product: DRI Version: DRI CVS Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: D

[Bug 11870] AIGLX DRM Probe Removes RADEON DRM Lock

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11870 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 12835] No RGB GLX visuals

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12835 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 12835] No RGB GLX visuals

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12835 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-17 10:22 PST --- Created an attachment (id=12089) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=12089&action=view) Xorg configuration file -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedes

[Bug 12835] No RGB GLX visuals

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12835 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-17 10:21 PST --- Created an attachment (id=12088) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=12088&action=view) Xorg log file -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/u

[Bug 12835] New: No RGB GLX visuals

2007-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12835 Summary: No RGB GLX visuals Product: Mesa Version: CVS Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Re: [patch] post superioctl inteface removal.

2007-10-17 Thread Thomas Hellström
Dave Airlie wrote: >> DRM_BO_HINT_DONT_FENCE is implied, and use that instead of the set pin >> interface. We can perhaps rename it to drmBOSetStatus or something more >> suitable. >> >> This will get rid of the user-space unfenced list access (which I >> believe was the main motivation behind t

Re: New DRI interface changes landed

2007-10-17 Thread Vincent Vanackere
2007/10/17, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Here's what I get if I attach a debugger : > > > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x2aed809c16c7 in ioctl () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > #1 0x2aed81fc2926 in drmFenceWait (fd=10, flags=, > > fence=0x1611fa0, flush_type=) at xf86drm.c:2520 > > #2 0x

Re: New DRI interface changes landed

2007-10-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 20:30 +0200, Vincent Vanackere wrote: > > On 10/16/07, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 19:54 +0200, Vincent Vanackere wrote: > > > > > > > > (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer > > > > (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_SGI_swap_contro