My thoughts are, we should unify the really common stuff... but I don't think
it's possible to unify r200_tex.c and r300_tex.c. The hardware is different, and
the file would end up with an #ifdef on every 3rd line; it doesn't make sense
here.
Just for really common code it does.
I don't know what
On 5/14/07, Christoph Brill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 22:53 +0200 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
> > Christoph Brill wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > find attached some minor cleanups I did while comparing r200 and r300
> > > code. Most of them are indention and cosmetical ch
Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 22:53 +0200 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
> Christoph Brill wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > find attached some minor cleanups I did while comparing r200 and r300
> > code. Most of them are indention and cosmetical changes. Only real
> > changes are that I replaced som
> >
> > if (
Christoph Brill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> find attached some minor cleanups I did while comparing r200 and r300
> code. Most of them are indention and cosmetical changes. Only real
> changes are that I replaced som
>
> if (0)
>
> with
>
> if (R200_DEBUG & DEBUG_TEXTURE)
>
> It generally reduces the dif
Hi,
find attached some minor cleanups I did while comparing r200 and r300
code. Most of them are indention and cosmetical changes. Only real
changes are that I replaced som
if (0)
with
if (R200_DEBUG & DEBUG_TEXTURE)
It generally reduces the diff between r200 and r300. That's it.
Review and c
On 5/14/07, Joseph Mulloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At this point I am very annoyed at the fact that the composite
> extension still does not work on my laptop. I am still unable to use
> Beryl or Compiz. I submitted this bug over 6 months ago and as far as
> I can tell it's been completely igno
