Re: Considering Radeon Xpress 200

2005-10-24 Thread Jesse Allen
On 10/24/05, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/24/05, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mb. I added the VideoRam option at 32768, but then X locks up at > > black screen when starting, but can ssh in ok. > > I'm not really sure how the newer IGPs deal with vram. Hopefully y

Re: Considering Radeon Xpress 200

2005-10-24 Thread Alex Deucher
On 10/24/05, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just bought a Compaq Presario V2405, which is similar to Daniel > Kasak's Turion. It has the Xpress 200M as well but on a Sempron cpu. > I got X.org cvs running with the 2d radeon driver just fine. I had to > add its pci id for drm radeon mo

Re: Considering Radeon Xpress 200

2005-10-24 Thread Jesse Allen
I just bought a Compaq Presario V2405, which is similar to Daniel Kasak's Turion. It has the Xpress 200M as well but on a Sempron cpu. I got X.org cvs running with the 2d radeon driver just fine. I had to add its pci id for drm radeon module to load. After starting X it says there is not enough

[Bug 4574] mach64: libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable returned false

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4574 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-24 17:13 --- I tri

Re: memory manager interface ...

2005-10-24 Thread Dave Airlie
> > I guess I don't see a problem with putting it in libdrm. I had just > assumed that the user-mode portion would end up living in > src/mesa/driver/dri/common or some place similar. There are some > advantages to putting it in libdrm, though (e.g., easier for EXA to use it). Well the X server

Re: radeon 9600 with RV350 AQ chip works

2005-10-24 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sunday 23 October 2005 17:58, Popolon wrote: > Popolon wrote: > > on some xscreensaver-4.16 mode, there are strange mapping of picture a > > band from picture and some reduced version at different scales. > > The bug was from xscreensaver as textures works perfectly on RV350_AQ > with xscreensav

[Bug 4087] indirect GLX crashs Xserver / in libGLcore.so ?

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-24 10:20 --- mmFin

Re: memory manager interface ...

2005-10-24 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Airlie wrote: > I've been thinking a bit about this, and while I think Ian's work on the > memory manager has merit I'm starting to think we are really putting the > cart before the horse in some ways > > My thinking on this is that the memor

Re: Quake4

2005-10-24 Thread Jacek Popławski
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:44:26PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > I'll find out this weekend. I just got it tonight, so I want to "test" > it on my 9600XT and Geforce4 Ti first. ;) and... will it run on DRI? -- Free Software - find interesting programs and change them NetHack - meet interesting c

[Bug 4858] Only root:root can do DRI

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4858 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 4858] New: Only root:root can do DRI

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4858 Summary: Only root:root can do DRI Product: DRI Versi

[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --