[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: radeon 9600 with RV350 AQ chip works

2005-10-23 Thread Popolon
Popolon wrote: on some xscreensaver-4.16 mode, there are strange mapping of picture a band from picture and some reduced version at different scales. The bug was from xscreensaver as textures works perfectly on RV350_AQ with xscreensaver-4.22 & xscreensaver-4.23. Is there a special process

[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-23 14:52 --- Wake

[Bug 4799] radeon driver should support 3d texture maps without raster fallback

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4799 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-23 14:07 --- This

[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 4277] via_dri.h out of sync with DDX driver.

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 4087] indirect GLX crashs Xserver / in libGLcore.so ?

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-23 05:26 --- Hello

Re: memory manager interface ...

2005-10-23 Thread Dave Airlie
> > So, something like Get/Set/UnsetAttribute() perhaps. > > But also, thinking about the use of these regions for DMA, synchronization is > important. I saw the SetFence() entrypoint, there's no way to retire these > fences, eg a FinishFence(). > > You've probably seen this one: > > http://oss.s

Re: memory manager interface ...

2005-10-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Airlie wrote: I've been thinking a bit about this, and while I think Ian's work on the memory manager has merit I'm starting to think we are really putting the cart before the horse in some ways My thinking on this is that the memory manager needs to live in libdrm, not like the current

[Bug 4087] indirect GLX crashs Xserver / in libGLcore.so ?

2005-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-23 02:15 --- I bui

memory manager interface ...

2005-10-23 Thread Dave Airlie
I've been thinking a bit about this, and while I think Ian's work on the memory manager has merit I'm starting to think we are really putting the cart before the horse in some ways My thinking on this is that the memory manager needs to live in libdrm, not like the current bits in Xorg DDX, b