[Bug 314] Radeon IGP 345M Graphics Controller Driver

2005-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: DRM problem on r300/ppc

2005-09-29 Thread Dave Airlie
> > is loaded before the radeon kernel module. > > > > I get this error with linux-2.6.13 and 2.6.9 both with agpgart and > > uninorth driver built in. The drm module is from cvs, and I've tried > > with xorg-6.8.99.15 and cvs. I'm running on a powebook5,2 with r300 > > card. You can find some logs

[Bug 4150] r300 cairo with glitz backend locks X

2005-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4150 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-29 19:45 --- This

Re: DRM problem on r300/ppc

2005-09-29 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 13:56 +0200, Dario Laera wrote: > Hi all, > since some week I'm no more able to load DRI, this is the error: > > (II) RADEON(0): [agp] 8192 kB allocated with handle 0x0001 > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] Could not add ring mapping > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize.

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:54:00PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-egl/2005-July/000565.html > > In particular, Andy's response about why they're uninterested in a common > libGL is basically The Last Word on the subject. It would require that > nvidia exp

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Allen Akin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:05:55PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: | ... Our goal is to | define the minimum that is required to be available on our platform. ... If by "our goal" you mean the goal of the Linux OpenGL ABI effort, then I agree. I i

Re: Refactor server-side __glXImageSize / __glXImage3DSize

2005-09-29 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Paul wrote: It's been a long time since I've looked at this stuff, but I'm not sure that __glXImageSize() is correct. Specifically, the last part of the function: [...] if (imageHeight > 0) { imageSize = (i

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Alan Cox
On Iau, 2005-09-29 at 22:02 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > And replacing system libraries is not something we can allow anyone. > It's totally reasonable to have different 3cards in the same systems > and they're supposed to work. Agreed - but the LSB job is still that of defining an ABI. Obvi

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (I corrected the CC address for the lsb-desktop list. It was incorrectly listed as being at lists.freedesktop.org, so none of this thread has made it to the list where the discussion should be.) Allen Akin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:54:00PM

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:07:56PM -0700, Andy Ritger wrote: > Some of the topics raised include: > > - minimum OpenGL version required by libGL > - SONAME change to libGL > - libGL installation path I think the single most important point is to explicitly disallow vendor-supplied lib

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Dave Airlie
> > I think the single most important point is to explicitly disallow > vendor-supplied libGL binaries in the LSB. Every other LSB componenet > relies on a single backing implementation for a reason, and in practice > the Nvidia libGL just causes endless pain where people acceidentally > link agai

Re: Refactor server-side __glXImageSize / __glXImage3DSize

2005-09-29 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Paul wrote: > It's been a long time since I've looked at this stuff, but I'm not sure > that __glXImageSize() is correct. Specifically, the last part of the > function: > > [...] > if (imageHeight > 0) { > imageSize = (imageHei

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Allen Akin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:54:00PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: | The deeper issue here is whether it's actually useful to require some minimum | level of functionality even when large swaths of it will be software. If I | don't have cube map support in hardware, do I really want to try it in | s

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thursday 29 September 2005 04:35, Dave Airlie wrote: > I have to agree with Christoph, the libGL should be a > one-size-fits-all and capable of loading drivers from any vendor, I'm > not sure what is so hard about this apart from the fact that neither > vendor has seemed willing to help out infr

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
On Thursday 29 September 2005 18:30, Alan Cox wrote: > On Iau, 2005-09-29 at 09:49 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:07:56PM -0700, Andy Ritger wrote: > > > Some of the topics raised include: > > > > > > - minimum OpenGL version required by libGL > > > - SONAME

Re: Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-29 Thread Alan Cox
On Iau, 2005-09-29 at 09:49 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:07:56PM -0700, Andy Ritger wrote: > > Some of the topics raised include: > > > > - minimum OpenGL version required by libGL > > - SONAME change to libGL > > - libGL installation path > > I think t

DRM problem on r300/ppc

2005-09-29 Thread Dario Laera
Hi all, since some week I'm no more able to load DRI, this is the error: (II) RADEON(0): [agp] 8192 kB allocated with handle 0x0001 (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] Could not add ring mapping (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make su

Re: xscreensaver freezes, reboot required

2005-09-29 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Jason Cook wrote: I do appologize if I'm cross posting here. I'm not sure which forum would be best to address this. I have a encountered an error when running xscreensaver-demo as a normal user. In Slackware 10.2 the daemon is not running by default and there is a popup window that promts to t