On Sunday 03 July 2005 00:04, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Is this table right?
>
> DRMDRI
> ffb ffb
> i810i830
> i830i830
> i915i915
With the caveat that i830 is old and deprecated.
> There are three DRI drivers with no DRM. What is up with these?
> gamma
> s3v
>
>
> There are three DRI drivers with no DRM. What is up with these?
> gamma
> s3v
> trident
>
Well gamma did have one but its got hosed as it wasn't very pretty and
responsbile for a lot of pain.. but keeping the dri driver building isnt
too much hassle.. and you never know someone out there might
Is this table right?
DRMDRI
ffb ffb
i810i830
i830i830
i915i915
mach64 mach64
mgamga
r128r128
radeonradeon or r200 or r300
savagesavage
sis sis
tdfx tdfx
via unichome
nonefb
There are three DRI
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2188
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
we may not be able to prevent all such cases doesn't mean we shouldn't
prevent the ones we can.
Without VPU recovery, it is very likely that the prices would be too high
to stand.
I really mean 'the ones we can'. All I'm saying is that we should try to
prevent it whenever reasonably possible a
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:51:23 -0400
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 03:24 +0300, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:48:11 -0400
> > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 18:05 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > > On Mon,
