Would anyone know whether tnl->render_inputs is still valid when using a
vertex shader program (in particular, arbvptorus) ?
thank you !
Vladimir Dergachev
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Inte
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:18 +0100, Felix KÃhling wrote:
> > >
> > > [...] only one display can use the DRM at the same time. There was
> > > a patch for the Radeon driver once that solved this problem by
> > > reinitializing the DRM on VT switches, but the Savage driver doesn't
> > > support this
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Rune Petersen wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
One thing you might try is to exchange the order of arguments or do
something similar. There are some comments by Nicolai on ordering of
arguments in r300_reg.h, these might reflect actual hardware limitations.
For example, I do
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Rune Petersen wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
One thing you might try is to exchange the order of arguments or do
something similar. There are some comments by Nicolai on ordering of
arguments in r300_reg.h, these might reflect actual hardware limitations.
For example, I do
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
One thing you might try is to exchange the order of arguments or do
something similar. There are some comments by Nicolai on ordering of
arguments in r300_reg.h, these might reflect actual hardware limitations.
For example, I do not understand why in flat texture shader
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2005, 22:06 +0500 schrieb Dimitry Naldayev:
> Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 01.02.2005, 23:13 +0500 schrieb Dimitry Naldayev:
> >>
> >> May will be better to make rm -rf /usr/X11R6 and build from CVS full Xorg,
> >> not only DRI part? But
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Rune Petersen wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
I see similar issues. I think alpha is still screwed up somehow.
If you hit ` to bring up console you will see that the transparency is
achieved by a dithered effect, rather than being a "true" transparency.
The only change I mad
Dimitry Naldayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I attach output of glxinfo. What mean table at the end of the output?
> what mean "slow" in the table?
>
Sorry, attachment go now...
--
glxinfo.report2
Description: output of glxinfo
Dimitry
Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 01.02.2005, 23:13 +0500 schrieb Dimitry Naldayev:
>>
>> May will be better to make rm -rf /usr/X11R6 and build from CVS full Xorg,
>> not only DRI part? But how host.def must look for this?
>
> If you really want to do this,
I am not s
I attached an updated patch that applies to latest CVS and includes a
fix along the lines of the one I just committed to texmem.c.
I havn't heard any feedback in over a week. If no one objects I'll
commit this tomorrow.
Regards,
Felix
Am Mittwoch, den 26.01.2005, 00:26 +0100 schrieb Felix Kühl
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
I see similar issues. I think alpha is still screwed up somehow.
If you hit ` to bring up console you will see that the transparency is
achieved by a dithered effect, rather than being a "true" transparency.
The only change I made to get this is an alpha instruction in
11 matches
Mail list logo
