[Bug 2010] New: depth and stencil readback are broken beyond x > 1023

2004-12-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2010 Summary: depth and stencil readback are broken beyond x > 1023 Product: M

new hyperz patch

2004-12-03 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Here's the new patch version (finally...). There are quite a few changes in it: - works with r100, rv250, hopefully r200 and rv100... still unsure though especially about rv100, but based on feedback (thanks Rogier) I've tried to come up with some different offset formula. - hierarchical-z is gon

[Bug 1776] R100 doesn't support EXT_stencil_wrap, but should

2004-12-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: radeon / r200 depth tiling / depth moves

2004-12-03 Thread Keith Whitwell
Roland Scheidegger wrote: I just came across depth moves (in radeon_dri.c). They are currently disabled by default, likely because they are slow (no wonder since the whole buffer is copied pixel by pixel, with a fairly complicated address calculation done per each pixel). Now, if I see that corr

radeon / r200 depth tiling / depth moves

2004-12-03 Thread Roland Scheidegger
I just came across depth moves (in radeon_dri.c). They are currently disabled by default, likely because they are slow (no wonder since the whole buffer is copied pixel by pixel, with a fairly complicated address calculation done per each pixel). Now, if I see that correctly, the purpose of dept

r300 testing on FireGL T2

2004-12-03 Thread Fionn Behrens
If you are one of the developers working on the r300 code and you feel the need to have tests run on a FireGL T2, contact me. I installed xorg cvs with all the patches some days ago, the card is recognized and DRI is active (at least the logs claim so). The Xorg setup is running very stable even

Re: DRI web site at fd.o (was: Re: [Dri-users] snapshots status)

2004-12-03 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:11:48PM +0100, Felix KÃhling wrote: > Am Mi, den 01.12.2004 schrieb Adam Jackson um 5:27: > > On Monday 29 November 2004 17:03, Felix KÃhling wrote: > > > There is no dri.freedesktop.org yet. I think there is no need for a > > > redirect. The current place is already diff