Okay I've gotten myself a 9200 card that can do 8x, and I've a
motherboard that can do it.. now I know some people will tell me 8x is of
no practical use (but then neither is my mach64 :-)
I spotted a patch from Hui Yu via Michael at
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-agp8x.diff
Why haven
Okay I think drmfntbl-0-0-1 is ready for its first merge back to the
trunk, it removes what I consider to be the low hanging fruit macros,
There are no more DRM_IOREMAP*, DRM_FIND_MAP, HAVE_DMA_FREELIST,
HAVE_DMA_WAITLIST, HAVE_DMA_SCHEDULE, DRIVER_CTX_[CD]TOR,
HAVE_KERNEL_CTX_SWITCH, DRIVER_BUF_
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1051
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1051
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-11 19:55 ---
Created an
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1051
Summary: Mesa/DRI Drivers need updating
Product: DRI
Versio
>
> Reminder to whoever decides to pick this up, please do this by importing
> the affected files to the mesa vendor branch, not committing to head.
> If you don't feel comfortable with this, please just file a bugzilla and
> assign to me and I'll get to it after the composite fires are put out.
A
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 18:28, Dave Airlie wrote:
> If you could pick up the latest radeon_vtxfmt.c, r200_pixel.c,
> r200_sanity.c files, they are pretty simple fixes...
>
> I've looked at radeon,r200,i915,i810,i830,mach64,gamma,mga,r128 drivers
>
> I'm not sure what the state of tdfx is, it has so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 21:28, Dave Airlie wrote:
> If you could pick up the latest radeon_vtxfmt.c, r200_pixel.c,
> r200_sanity.c files, they are pretty simple fixes...
>
> I've looked at radeon,r200,i915,i810,i830,mach64,gamma,mga,r128 drivers
>
If you could pick up the latest radeon_vtxfmt.c, r200_pixel.c,
r200_sanity.c files, they are pretty simple fixes...
I've looked at radeon,r200,i915,i810,i830,mach64,gamma,mga,r128 drivers
I'm not sure what the state of tdfx is, it has some changes...
Dave.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Kevin E Martin w
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 07:07 am, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Judging from /sys/dev/drm/ contents, and listed kernel options in NOTES,
> there's currently evidence of support for i810/830 chips in FreeBSD,
> which (I suspect) is the probable reason why DRI is not enabled on my
> box
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, John Baldwin wrote:
> The i830 DRM stuff is ported in a branch of DRI, but it's not in DRI head
> because of a security problem with the code.
Just out of curiousity, does this support the original i810 chipset?
ie: agp0: mem
0xff00-0xff07,0xf400-0xf7ff irq
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=979
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=770
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 21:59, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >From Erdi Chen: " the Via unichrome chip supports system memory to
> framebuffer DMA bitblt, currently the DRI driver maps the IO registers to
> user space, that maybe a problem"
>
> Now that statement is enough for me to block it going anywhere u
>
> No, it doesnt. Actually, the Intel driver going forward currently is
> the i915 driver, which is going to be in the next X.Org release, is
> apparently secure, is ported to FreeBSD (untested iirc -- I'm setting up
> a machine now), and supports i830-i915. There's been a suggestion that
> i915
>
> Mach64 isn't entirely secure. Yes we know that the author said so. The
> via one I'm still trying to track down but its entirely A said B said
> C thought D considered it insecure.
>
> I need the original source of the rumour so I can find out if its true
Well I've be spreading the rumour fro
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 13:01, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > The i830 DRM stuff is ported in a branch of DRI, but it's not in DRI head
> > because of a security problem with the code.
>
> Just out of curiousity, does this support the original i810 chipset
There is a working i830 DRM driver for Linux in the old dri cvs in the
drm subdirectory. DRM is still using the old DRI tree CVS.
Try current DRM CVS and see if it will build the i830 driver for BSD. I
don't run BSD so I can't check. It might now be too much work to port
the Linux one over to BSD
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 13:53, Thomas HellstrÃm wrote:
When I did some cleaning up of the via drm code I noticed that the memory
manager seems identical to the SiS one, so if there is a problem with
that, then there is a problem with the via driver.
Yeah I
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 01:29, Dave Airlie wrote:
Can the VIA DRI stuff get pushed through to the kernel with the S3
stuff please, even if we mark VIA as experimental
the DRM stuff? We need to mark as insecure, I really don't want anything
that the authors consider insecure to go anyw
On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 13:53, Thomas HellstrÃm wrote:
> When I did some cleaning up of the via drm code I noticed that the memory
> manager seems identical to the SiS one, so if there is a problem with
> that, then there is a problem with the via driver.
Yeah I know about one.
> Also the unichrome
Hi there,
Judging from /sys/dev/drm/ contents, and listed kernel options in NOTES,
there's currently evidence of support for i810/830 chips in FreeBSD,
which (I suspect) is the probable reason why DRI is not enabled on my
box (FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT from yesterday, latest X.Org). I also found
traces
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1036
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-11 07:44 ---
This sounds
Hi!
> On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 02:20, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> the VIA/mach64/savage DRM when setup by the current DDXs all allow evil
>> things from my current understanding, that is why they're DDXs haven't
>> got
>> the DRI support turned on by default in Xorg, so those DRMs are not to
>> be
>> built
On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 02:20, Dave Airlie wrote:
> the VIA/mach64/savage DRM when setup by the current DDXs all allow evil
> things from my current understanding, that is why they're DDXs haven't got
> the DRI support turned on by default in Xorg, so those DRMs are not to be
> built into a release,
On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 01:29, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > Can the VIA DRI stuff get pushed through to the kernel with the S3
> > stuff please, even if we mark VIA as experimental
>
> the DRM stuff? We need to mark as insecure, I really don't want anything
> that the authors consider insecure to go a
On Mer, 2004-08-11 at 02:00, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> --- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Can the VIA DRI stuff get pushed through to the kernel with the S3
> > > stuff please, even if we mark VIA as experimental
> >
> > the DRM stuff? We need to mark as insecure, I really don't
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1036
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-11 02:50 ---
Created an
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1036
Summary: rendering error - miscolored objects
Product: Mesa
On 2004-08-11 16:51:59 +0800 Philipp Klaus Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Radeon 9200 is supported by the r200 driver.
We need ATI releasing docs for r300 and above.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
Radeon 9200 is supported by the r200 driver.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free
I was wondering if the specs for these cards are legally
released/obtainable by the public. I can't even use the proprietary ati
driver with XFree 4.4.0. Any insigth is appreciated.
--
Happy Hacking,
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
32 matches
Mail list logo
