>
> Depends on your compile options and platforms what bites you but pretty
> much all of the old DRI code in the tree is touching user pages without
> the proper functions and the like.
>
> It might be worth merging Arjan van de Ven's sparse patches into DRI so
> you can run the sparse verifier ov
On Iau, 2004-07-29 at 23:39, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > The 2.6.5 module shipped with the kernel is definitely broken for lots
> > of reasons, on 32bit as well.
>
> that's wierd as the one in the CVS tree is the exact same and I've seen
> no-one complain about it.. care to quantify.. I don't own o
>
> The 2.6.5 module shipped with the kernel is definitely broken for lots
> of reasons, on 32bit as well.
that's wierd as the one in the CVS tree is the exact same and I've seen
no-one complain about it.. care to quantify.. I don't own one of these
cards (I actually do but it is in Ireland and I
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:55:48 +0100, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have S3virge DRI ported but not working
>
While you are on this fixing up old chipsets kick, you ought to finish
off the trident and tdlabs drivers. :)
Alex
---
This
On Iau, 2004-07-29 at 01:27, Ian Romanick wrote:
> So, I'm going to rework the interface a little bit so that the allocator
> can look at all the require allocations at once. It will place them in
> memory using some sort of path finding algorithm (probably A*). That
> seems like a reasonably
On Iau, 2004-07-29 at 08:38, Kenan Esau wrote:
> > My testing has been limited to the older DRI with Arjan's patches to fix
> > user/kernel confusion and radeon cards, but that much does work.
>
> Did you also use an older Matrox card G200/G400, ... ??
>
> I assume the error is located somewhere
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:15:29PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> >
> > Have you ported the required i915 AGP changes as well ??
>
> well I've only got a i865 so I hopefully don't need any i915 specific
> stuff..
O.k. that makes sense. It wasn't clear from your original email.
Maybe Eric can she
>
> Have you ported the required i915 AGP changes as well ??
well I've only got a i865 so I hopefully don't need any i915 specific
stuff..
Dave.
--
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie
pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
-
Dave Airlie wrote:
I've just checked in the basics of the i915 DRM for FreeBSD but nothing
happens... I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1,
After I kldload i915.ko I see nothing in the dmesg... am I missing
something? or as the AGP driver stolen the card?
Oh, yes. This is something you need to look at. The
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:18:05PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I've just checked in the basics of the i915 DRM for FreeBSD but nothing
> happens... I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1,
>
> After I kldload i915.ko I see nothing in the dmesg... am I missing
> something? or as the AGP driver stolen the card
I've put a patch to add support for mixed 32/64 DRI clients on 64bit
platforms to bugzilla:
http://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=943
I've used this patch for quite a while now. The version in bugzilla
applies to Mesa6 as in the X.Org CVS head.
Egbert.
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=930
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-29 04:52 ---
Created an atta
I've just checked in the basics of the i915 DRM for FreeBSD but nothing
happens... I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1,
After I kldload i915.ko I see nothing in the dmesg... am I missing
something? or as the AGP driver stolen the card?
Regards,
Dave.
--
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=930
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-29 03:29 ---
Could you attac
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:44:25 -0600
Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
[snip]
> > The second problem is in the server-side GLX code. The definition of
> > GL_FOG_COORD_SOURCE is missing in glxext.h which is needed in
> > singlesize.c. I don't know if this should be fixed i
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I asked this at OLS and no one knew of an open source x86 Open Firmware
> emulator.
How do the NetBSD guys handle it? I heard (at OLS :-) they do run OF ROMs.
> --- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Mer, 2004-07-28 at 22:3
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 11:28, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2004-07-28 at 07:57, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > Kenan Esau wrote:
> > > I am sorry if I am asking FAQs. But I just want to know if someone is
> > > working on this and if I can help debugging this problem.
> > >
> > > If you think there is no pro
17 matches
Mail list logo
