Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-05 22:49 ---
OK Well I've fixe
I'm copying the list sans attachments in case someone else runs
into the same problem as I (for the archives) -- it turns out that the
"bug" was just my own stupidity.
-Forwarded Message-
From: Christopher Gleba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-05 19:59 ---
(In reply to comm
I dunno if these are intended, or bug.
glxgears
without page flipping
252.8fps uncovered
1294.0fps completely covered
with page flipping
278.2fps uncovered
83fps completely covered
Also while running switching to console then back to X tearing is
observed in glx gears when it wasn't present befor
I'm not 100% sure but I know the + and - show whether the bit is set or not. If the
bit is set
then that means the feature is on, so the driver MUST use it or there should be
problems. By
problems I mean crashes or rendering errors, more than it just being slow.
--- Chris Ison <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I don't know if its relevent, but just a couple of observations to do
with glxgears that "may" help pinpoint whats going on.
glxgears normally does about 250fps, if I enlarge its windows to cover
the the entire screen this drops to about 80fps, but if I cover the
window it jumps up to about 1270fp
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 07:57, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> lspci -vvv
>
That just tells me the card is capable of using it, doesn't actually
tell my if DRI is taking advantage of it.
With and without DRI installed it tells me the same thing
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- Par
lspci -vvv
--- Chris Ison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a couple of kernel recompiles I got oprofile to work, and it was
> reporting that most of its time was spend in default_idle for both
> glxgears and qw-client-glx (from QuakeForge CVS).
>
> After speaking to one of the oprofile ppl, the
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-05 16:56 ---
Created an attach
After a couple of kernel recompiles I got oprofile to work, and it was
reporting that most of its time was spend in default_idle for both
glxgears and qw-client-glx (from QuakeForge CVS).
After speaking to one of the oprofile ppl, they seem to think that this
is as much as I will get cause it appe
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-05 13:43 ---
Created an attach
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-05 13:40 ---
(In reply to comm
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-05 12:12 ---
(In reply to comm
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:06:33AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:44:49PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> >
> >>Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:44:06AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> I've created a newmesa bra
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:44:49PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:44:06AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I've created a newmesa branch that I'll be updating the Imakefiles so
that we can use the new Mesa trunk code with XFree86.
It'
I have just completed committing all of the code I have for the new
interface between libGL and client-side DRI drivers. I've been working
on this stuff off and on (mostly off, though) since about June.
At this point *almost* all of the client-side code is in place to
support SGIX_fbconifgs and SG
18 matches
Mail list logo
