В сообщении от 20 Сентябрь 2003 18:05 Rafael Maximo написал:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to focus on 2D problem first but i don't know how I can
> debug the 2D driver and found where is the problem. I would appreciate any
> information or docs about debugging this kind of problem.
I have fixed so
В сообщении от 21 Сентябрь 2003 05:37 Alex Deucher написал:
> you might compare it to Tim's old 2D driver (shipped with 4.3.0) and
> see what's changed...assuming his driver works for you in 2D.
the guys from S3 have reorganized savage_driver.c
so diff between S3 and savage-0-0-1-branch of dri (I
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 20:54 ---
Which file in the xfre
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 19:30 ---
> How does that explai
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 18:43 ---
> From Jon Smirl 2003-
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 18:29 ---
It's the X server, as
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 18:16 ---
I believe the close co
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 18:05 ---
> The usage count of a
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 15:36 ---
> > I guess the X serv
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=716
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 11:41 ---
Output of "LIBGL_DEBUG
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 11:07 ---
> Good. So the real pr
The drmCommandRead and friends are a wrapper for ioctl. I think the
idea was that they were for portability, but I can't remember. Note
that the numbering of the commands for drmCommand* are different from
the ioctl numbers (subtract 0x40 iirc) -- look at the .h in the
DRM and the _common.h in
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=716
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-09 07:33 ---
Of course they are now
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:29, Rafael Maximo wrote:
> At 12:44 AM 19/9/2003, Dimitry N. Naldaev wrote:
> >Ð ÑообÑении Ð¾Ñ 18 СенÑÑбÑÑ 2003 08:06 Rafael Maximo
> >напиÑал:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Some of you already know that i'm trying to work on the savage
> > > dri
15 matches
Mail list logo
