Re: [Dri-devel] Observations about dynamic extension registration

2003-07-31 Thread Felix Kühling
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:12:47 -0600 Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >> Felix Kühling wrote: > >> > >>> I observed that glXQueryExtensionsString calls glXInitialize first which > >>> in turn loads and initializes the dri drivers (calls the

Re: [PATCH] Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 9000 Mobility (r250 lf) issue

2003-07-31 Thread Keith Whitwell
It would be simple to add some checking to ensure the chipid is recognized by the 3d driver, just hasn't been done yet. Let me work up a patch that does this in a more generally way. The current big switch-statement is somewhat unpleasant.Do the embedded drivers have a header file where

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-07 12:19 --- I'm not sure if this is any help, but now I get an infinite loop of: (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020 (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting en

Re: [PATCH] Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 9000 Mobility (r250 lf) issue

2003-07-31 Thread Ian Romanick
Keith Whitwell wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:06, Ian Romanick wrote: Here's a patch that should clear some of that up, at least for the R200-family of chips. I did change the code to include xf86PciInfo.h. In spite of the comment there, it doesn't s

Re: [Dri-devel] Observations about dynamic extension registration

2003-07-31 Thread Brian Paul
Keith Whitwell wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: Felix Kühling wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:20:28 -0700 Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Felix Kühling wrote: I see: C SPECIFICATION const char * glXQueryExtensionsString( Display *dpy, int scree

Re: [PATCH] Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 9000 Mobility (r250 lf) issue

2003-07-31 Thread Keith Whitwell
Ian Romanick wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:06, Ian Romanick wrote: Antoine REVERSAT wrote: I just compiled dri from the CVS for my radeon 9000 Mobbility card (r250 lf) and it wont work as good as it is expected to (I.E : 30 fps in Quake3) The thing is when i do a glxinf

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-07 09:02 --- Make sure the agpgart module is loaded before the radeon DRM module. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

Re: [Dri-devel] Observations about dynamic extension registration

2003-07-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 01:02, Ian Romanick wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:26, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >>[...] we don't want the R200 driver to expose GLX_MESA_swap_control > >>if there's no vblank interrupt available. Since it can't implement > >>the functionality

Re: [Dri-devel] [Fwd: [Qube-announce] Q for Linux 1.1 alphareleased and LEGO Digital Designer shipped]

2003-07-31 Thread Doug Rabson
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 19:33, Andreas Stenglein wrote: > Am 2003.07.25 18:44:20 +0200 schrieb(en) Doug Rabson: > > Oh, I meant to say also that if anyone is interested in tracking down > > and fixing the r200 rendering problems, I can supply full buildable > > source code to the low-level OpenGL par

Re: [PATCH] Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 9000 Mobility (r250 lf) issue

2003-07-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 07:49, Ian Romanick wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:06, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >>[...] do we really need to check the > >>device ID against R100-family IDs in the R200 driver? > > > > Apparently, people do try to use the wrong drivers on the

[Dri-devel] Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.

2003-07-31 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require attention. All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and decid